Quantitative assessment of cortical excitability in Alzheimer’s dementia and its association with clinical symptoms: A systematic review and meta‐analyses

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAlzheimer’s Disease (AD) is characterized by cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS). Studies using electroencephalography (EEG) have shown increased epileptiform and epileptic activity in AD. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies have also shown abnormal cortical excitability in AD, however findings have been inconsistent. Further, relationship between cortical excitability and clinical symptoms of AD is not clear. This review and meta‐analyses aims to synthesize the existing evidence for abnormal cortical excitability in AD and its relationship with clinical symptoms.MethodWe systematically searched and reviewed publications that quantitatively assessed cortical excitability, using TMS resting motor threshold (rMT), active motor threshold (aMT), motor evoked potential (MEP) or directly from the cortex using TMS‐EEG via TMS‐evoked potential (TEP). Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of rMT and aMT were calculated using Hedges’ g and meta‐analyzed using a random effects model. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed by Cochran’s Q and I2 statistic.ResultWe identified 895 publications out of which 68 were reviewed in full‐text and 37 were included in the final review. Thirty studies using rMT and seven using aMT were included in the meta‐analyses. The AD group had reduced rMT (Hedges’ g = ‐0.99, 95% CI [‐1.29, ‐0.68], p < 0.00001) and aMT (Hedges’ g = ‐0.87, 95% CI [‐1.50, ‐0.24], p < 0.00001) as compared with control groups, indicative of higher cortical excitability. Evidence of considerable heterogeneity was found across the studies (Q (29) = 85.68, p < 0.00001, I2 =81%). Qualitative review of the literature showed some evidence of increased MEP amplitude (n = 2 studies), however findings related to TEP were inconsistent. Further, there was some evidence (n = 4 studies) supporting an inverse association between cortical excitability and global cognition. No publications reported on the relationship between cortical excitability and neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS).ConclusionThere is strong evidence of increased motor cortex excitability in AD and some evidence of an inverse association between excitability and cognition. Future studies should assess cortical excitability from non‐motor areas and examine its relationship with cognition and NPS.