Quantitative Assessment of Breast Tumor: Comparison of Four Methods of Positioning Region of Interest for Synthetic Relaxometry and Diffusion Measurement

Abstract

ObjectivesTo compare the differences in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and synthetic magnetic resonance (MR) measurements of four region of interest (ROI) placement methods for breast tumor and to investigate their diagnostic performance. Methods110 (70 malignant, 40 benign) newly diagnosed breast tumors were evaluated. The patients underwent 3.0T MR examinations including diffusion-weighted imaging and synthetic MR. Two radiologists independently measured ADCs, T1 relaxation time (T1), T2 relaxation time (T2), and proton density (PD) using four ROI methods: round, square, freehand, and whole-tumor volume (WTV). The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess their measurement reliability. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. ResultsThe mean values of all ROI methods showed good or excellent interobserver reproducibility (0.79~0.99) and showed the best diagnostic performance compared to the minimum and maximum values. The square ROI exhibited superior performance in differentiating between benign from malignant breast lesions, followed by the freehand ROI. T2, PD, and ADC values were significantly lower in malignant breast lesions compared to benign ones for all ROI methods (p < 0.05). Multiparameters of T2 + ADC demonstrated the highest AUC values (0.82~0.95), surpassing the diagnostic efficacy of ADC or T2 alone (p < 0.05). ConclusionsROI placement significantly influences ADC and synthetic MR values measured in breast tumors. Square ROI and mean values showed superior performance in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions. The multiparameters of T2 + ADC surpassed the diagnostic efficacy of a single parameter.