Quantitative and qualitative sensory testing results are associated with numbness rather than neuropathic pain in patients with post-implant trigeminal neuropathy: a cross-sectional pilot study

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to characterize the sensory profile of patients with post-implant trigeminal neuropathy and identify the association between subjective symptoms and objective signs including psychophysical testing and radiographic imaging. This study further evaluated to the association between quantitative sensory testing (QST)/qualitative sensory testing (QualST) and the severity of nerve injury graded by radiographic imaging.Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 34 patients diagnosed with post-implant trigeminal neuropathy. Data on the neuropathic pain symptom inventory (NPSI), thermal and electric QST, bedside QualST, and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was collected and the association between these variables were analysed.Results: Numbness was the most common subjective symptom and evoked pain was the most frequent neuropathic pain. There was no significant correlation between negative and positive symptoms. Spearman’s rank correlation analyses indicated that objective findings including QST/QualST correlated with a sensory loss profile rather than a gain of function profile. Moderate positive correlations between some positive symptoms and the score of QualST were observed. The Mann–Whitney U test showed that subjective symptoms did not differ according to the severity of nerve damage according to CBCT, but the electric QST and QualST was discriminative.Conclusions: This study suggests that QST/QualST associated with the severity of nerve damage according to CBCT might be useful in assessing numbness in patients with negative and positive symptoms after implant surgery, but may be of marginal utility in the evaluation of neuropathic pain within the limitation of this cross-sectional study with small sample size.