Abstract

We conducted quantitative analysis of the recovery process during pure iron annealing using the modified Williamson-Hall and Warren-Averbach methods. We prepared four types of specimens with different dislocation substructures. By increasing the annealing temperature, we confirmed a decrease in dislocation density. In particular, screw-dislocation density substantially decreased in the early stage of the recovery process, while edge-dislocation density gradually decreased as annealing temperature increased. Moreover, changes in hardness during the recovery process mainly depended on edge-dislocation density. Increases in annealing temperature weakly affected the dislocation arrangement parameter and crystallite size. Recovery-process modeling demonstrated that the decrease in screw-dislocation density during the recovery process was mainly dominated by glide and/or cross-slip with dislocation core diffusion. In contrast, the decrease in edge-dislocation density during the recovery process was governed by a climbing motion with both dislocation core diffusion and lattice self-diffusion. From the above results, we succeeded in quantitatively distinguishing between edge- and screw-dislocation density during the recovery process, which are difficult to distinguish using transmission electron microscope and electron backscatter diffraction.

Highlights

  • Iron and steel are widely used in several applications owing to their low-cost and mass production

  • In the case of screw dislocation, the value of Q was close to that for dislocation core diffusion (174 kJ·mol−1 [26]), which means that the decrease in screw-dislocation density during the recovery process was mainly dominated by glide and/or cross-slip with dislocation core diffusion

  • Changes in hardness during the recovery process mainly depended on edge-dislocation density

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Iron and steel are widely used in several applications owing to their low-cost and mass production. A key process in the design of iron and steel is mainly to control recovery and recrystallization in the annealing process. The interaction between recovery and recrystallization is important to control the microstructure during annealing. The interaction between recovery and recrystallization during annealing in iron and steel was extensively investigated [1,2,3,4,5,6]. For low-carbon steel, Osawa et al [1] reported that the formation of C–Mn dipoles leads to the retardation of recovery and changes in the recrystallization texture. Belyakov et al [2] demonstrated that the recrystallization progress slows down when recovery is rapid. We pointed out that the recrystallization progress is retarded in the later stage of annealing because of the extremely rapid progress of recovery. A precise understanding of the recovery process during annealing is crucial for analyzing recrystallization behavior

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call