Abstract

BackgroundThe emergence of positron emission tomography (PET) in prostate cancer is impacting clinical practice, but little is known about PET imaging as a tool to determine treatment failure in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). ObjectiveTo evaluate PET imaging dynamics in mCRPC patients on enzalutamide with stable computed tomography (CT) and technetium-99m (Tc99) bone scans. Design, setting, and participantsAll patients were on treatment with enzalutamide for first-line mCRPC in a clinical trial at the National Cancer Institute (Bethesda, MD, USA). A volunteer sample had serial 18F-sodium fluoride (NaF) PET in parallel with CT and Tc99. Regions of interest (ROIs) on NaF were analyzed quantitatively for response. InterventionPatients were randomized to enzalutamide with/without a cancer immunotherapy, Prostvac. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisA post hoc, descriptive analysis was performed comparing the changes seen on CT and Tc99 as per RECIST 1.1 with NaF PET scans including the use of a quantitative analysis. Results and limitationsEighteen mCRPC patients had 67 NaF scans. A total of 233 ROIs resolved after treatment, 52 (22%) of which eventually retuned while on therapy. In all, 394 new ROIs were seen, but 112(28%) resolved subsequently. Of 18 patients, 14 had new ROIs that ultimately resolved after appearing. Many patients experienced progression in a minority of lesions, and one patient with radiation intervention to oligoprogression had a remarkable response. This study is limited by its small number of patients and post hoc nature. ConclusionsThese data highlight the dynamic nature of NaF PET in mCRPC patients treated with enzalutamide, where not all new findings were ultimately related to disease progression. This analysis also provides a potential strategy to identify and intervene in oligoprogression in prostate cancer. Patient summaryIn this small analysis of patients with prostate cancer on enzalutamide, changes on 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography (PET) imaging were not always associated with treatment failure. Caution may be indicated when using PET imaging to determine whether new therapy is needed.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call