Abstract
Conventional (visual) analysis of EMG was compared to a computerized quantitative method (turns/amplitude). Ten patients with a clinical history of peripheral nerve lesion were examined in order to investigate whether quantitative analysis of EMG increased the diagnostic sensitivity of peripheral nerve lesions to the laryngeal muscles. Quantitative analysis either agreed with conventional analysis or resulted in false negative diagnosis compared to conventional analysis. Thus, conventional analysis turned out to be more sensitive to neurogenic damage than the quantitative method. EMG results were compared to clinical findings.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Paper version not known
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
