Abstract

BackgroundThe use of radiolabeled choline as a positron emission tomography (PET) agent for imaging primary tumors in the prostate has been evaluated extensively over the past two decades. There are, however, conflicting reports of its sensitivity and the relationship between choline PET imaging and disease staging is not fully understood. Moreover, relatively few studies have investigated the correlation between tracer uptake and histological tumor grade. This work quantified 18F-fluorocholine in tumor and healthy prostate tissue using pharmacokinetic modeling and stratified uptake parameters by histology grade. Additionally, the effect of scan time on the estimation of the kinetic exchange rate constants was evaluated, and the tracer influx parameters from full compartmental analysis were compared to uptake values quantified by Patlak and standardized uptake value (SUV) analyses.18F-fluorocholine was administered as a 222 MBq bolus injection to ten patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate tumors, and dynamic PET data were acquired for 60 min. Image-derived arterial input functions were scaled by discrete blood samples, and a 2-tissue, 4-parameter model accounting for blood volume (2T4k+Vb) was used to perform fully quantitative compartmental modeling on tumor, healthy prostate, and muscle tissue. Subsequently, all patients underwent radical prostatectomy, and histological analyses were performed on the prostate specimens; kinetic parameters for tumors were stratified by Gleason score. Correlations were investigated between compartmental K1 and Ki parameters and SUV and Patlak slope; the effect of scan time on parameter bias was also evaluated.ResultsCholine activity curves in seven tumors, eight healthy prostate regions, and nine muscle regions were analyzed. Net tracer influx was generally higher in tumor relative to healthy prostate, with the values in the highest grade tumors markedly higher than those in lower grade tumors. Influx terms from Patlak and full compartmental modeling showed good correlation within individual tissue groups. Kinetic parameters calculated from the entire 60-min scan data were accurately reproduced from the first 30 min of acquired data (R2 ≈ 0.9).ConclusionsStrong correlations were observed between Ki and Patlak slope in tumor tissue, and K1 and SUV were also correlated but to a lesser degree. Reliable estimates of all kinetic parameters can be achieved from the first 30 min of dynamic 18F-choline data. Although SUV, K1, Ki, and Patlak slope were found to be poor differentiators of low-grade tumor compared to healthy prostate tissue, they are strong indicators of aggressive disease.

Highlights

  • Prostate cancer (PCa) is common in the USA and is the second leading cause of cancer death in men

  • standardized uptake value (SUV), K1, Ki, and Patlak slope were found to be poor differentiators of low-grade tumor compared to healthy prostate tissue, they are strong indicators of aggressive disease

  • Focal 18F-choline uptake was identified in eight prostates, which were confirmed tumors by histology with 3 having Gleason score 3 + 4, 1 with 3 + 5, and 4 with 4 + 3

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Prostate cancer (PCa) is common in the USA and is the second leading cause of cancer death in men. In 2015, 220,800 American men were diagnosed and 27,540 are expected to die from the disease [1]. Prognoses are generally good for this disease but accurate diagnoses are critical, as the therapeutic options depend on the aggressiveness and potential progression of the disease. Most prostate cancers are detected first by a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood test or digital rectal exam and are confirmed through subsequent biopsy. The patient will undergo diagnostic imaging procedures to assess the spread of the disease and plan treatment. Common imaging modalities include transrectal ultrasound, MRI, and PET/CT. MRI sessions generally consist of T1- and T2-weighted, DWI (diffusion-weighted imaging), and sometimes DCE (dynamic contrast enhanced) and spectroscopy sequences

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call