Abstract

The classical approach to flood frequency analysis (FFA) may result in significant jumps in the estimates of upper quantiles along with the lengthening series of measurements. Our proposal is a multi-model approach, also called the aggregation technique, which has turned out to be an effective method for the modeling of maximum flows, in large part eliminating the disadvantages of traditional methods. In this article, we present a probability mixture model relying on the aggregation the probabilities of non-exceedance of a constant flow value from the candidate distributions; and we compare it with the previously presented model of quantile mixture, which consists in aggregating the quantiles of the same order from individual models. Here, we defined an asymptotic standard error of design quantiles for both statistical models in two versions: without the bias of quantiles from candidate distributions with respect to aggregated quantiles and with taking it into account. The simulation experiment indicates that the latter version is more accurate and allows for reducing the quantile bias with respect to the unknown population quantile. For the case study, the 0.99 quantiles are determined for both variants of aggregation along with the assessment of its accuracy. The differences between the two proposed aggregation methods are discussed.

Highlights

  • The extreme hydrological phenomena, such as heavy rainfalls, floods, droughts, and storm surges, have been within the interest of scientists for decades

  • The Ga, We, and LN distributions are commonly used in the flood frequency analysis (FFA), while the Inverse Gaussian (IG) and Generalized exponential (GE) distributions have been introduced to flood frequency modeling of Polish data by Strupczewski et al [38] and Markiewicz et al [32], respectively

  • An aggregation by a mixture of probabilities of non-exceedance has been proposed in this paper as a new variant of multi-model approach in flood frequency analysis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The extreme hydrological phenomena, such as heavy rainfalls, floods, droughts, and storm surges, have been within the interest of scientists for decades. The floods, as the one of natural hazards causing the greatest threat to the life and property of the population and the national economy, are investigated especially in the days of global climate change [1,2,3,4,5]. Estimating the probable maximum flow in subsequent years is an issue of flood frequency analysis (FFA). According to the principles of hydrological practice, a maximum flow is the greatest instantaneous peak flow of floods in a period of interest, e.g., a hydrological year, season, etc. Maximum flows are determined by the National. When it is not possible to measure the flow during the culmination (due to dangerous conditions for the measurement teams or too fast hydrological response of the catchment preventing teams from arriving on time), the peak flow is estimated on the basis of the maximum water level and the current flow rate curve

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call