Abstract
We present new scaling expressions, including high-Reynolds-number ($Re$) predictions, for all Reynolds stress components in the entire flow domain of turbulent channel and pipe flows. In Part 1 (She et al., J. Fluid Mech., vol. 827, 2017, pp. 322–356), based on the dilation symmetry of the mean Navier–Stokes equation a four-layer formula of the Reynolds shear stress length $\ell _{12}$ – and hence also the entire mean velocity profile (MVP) – was obtained. Here, random dilations on the second-order balance equations for all the Reynolds stresses (shear stress $-\overline{u^{\prime }v^{\prime }}$, and normal stresses $\overline{u^{\prime }u^{\prime }}$, $\overline{v^{\prime }v^{\prime }}$, $\overline{w^{\prime }w^{\prime }}$) are analysed layer by layer, and similar four-layer formulae of the corresponding stress length functions $\ell _{11}$, $\ell _{22}$, $\ell _{33}$ (hence the three turbulence intensities) are obtained for turbulent channel and pipe flows. In particular, direct numerical simulation (DNS) data are shown to agree well with the four-layer formulae for $\ell _{12}$ and $\ell _{22}$ – which have the celebrated linear scalings in the logarithmic layer, i.e. $\ell _{12}\approx \unicode[STIX]{x1D705}y$ and $\ell _{22}\approx \unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{22}y$. However, data show an invariant peak location for $\overline{w^{\prime }w^{\prime }}$, which theoretically leads to an anomalous scaling in $\ell _{33}$ in the log layer only, namely $\ell _{33}\propto y^{1-\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}}$ with $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}\approx 0.07$. Furthermore, another mesolayer modification of $\ell _{11}$ yields the experimentally observed location and magnitude of the outer peak of $\overline{u^{\prime }u^{\prime }}$. The resulting $-\overline{u^{\prime }v^{\prime }}$, $\overline{u^{\prime }u^{\prime }}$, $\overline{v^{\prime }v^{\prime }}$ and $\overline{w^{\prime }w^{\prime }}$ are all in good agreement with DNS and experimental data in the entire flow domain. Our additional results include: (1) the maximum turbulent production is located at $y^{+}\approx 12$; (2) the location of peak value $-\overline{u^{\prime }v^{\prime }}_{p}$ has a scaling transition from $5.7Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}}^{1/3}$ to $1.5Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}}^{1/2}$ at $Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}}\approx 3000$, with a $1+\overline{u^{\prime }v^{\prime }}_{p}^{+}$ scaling transition from $8.5Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}}^{-2/3}$ to $3.0Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}}^{-1/2}$ ($Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}}$ the friction Reynolds number); (3) the peak value $\overline{w^{\prime }w^{\prime }}_{p}^{+}\approx 0.84Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}}^{0.14}(1-48/Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}})$; (4) the outer peak of $\overline{u^{\prime }u^{\prime }}$ emerges above $Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}}\approx 10^{4}$ with its location scaling as $1.1Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}}^{1/2}$ and its magnitude scaling as $2.8Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}}^{0.09}$; (5) an alternative derivation of the log law of Townsend (1976, The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow, Cambridge University Press), namely, $\overline{u^{\prime }u^{\prime }}^{+}\approx -1.25\ln y+1.63$ and $\overline{w^{\prime }w^{\prime }}^{+}\approx -0.41\ln y+1.00$ in the bulk.
Highlights
The mean effect of turbulence is the primary question in turbulent flows, and mean quantities in wall-bounded turbulent flows have been studied for centuries
This section is devoted to a complete treatment of the mean momentum equation and the second-order balance equations for the four Reynolds stresses under a random dilation transformation
The symmetry approach developed in Part 1 (She et al 2017) for the mean velocity profiles is extended here to quantify the Reynolds stress tensor in channel and pipe flows
Summary
The mean effect of turbulence is the primary question in turbulent flows, and mean quantities in wall-bounded turbulent flows have been studied for centuries. An important conceptual model is the wall-attached hypothesis by Townsend (1976) It suggests quantitative descriptions for turbulent eddies (in a statistical sense) and leads to constant profiles for active motions (−u v , v v ) and log profiles for inactive motions (u u , w w ) in the bulk flow (Davidson et al 2011), i.e. where A11, A33, B11, B12, B22 and B33 are all constants, + denotes values in wall units, and y is the wall distance normalized by half-channel height or pipe radius R. where A11, A33, B11, B12, B22 and B33 are all constants, + denotes values in wall units, and y is the wall distance normalized by half-channel height or pipe radius R This hypothesis has received acute attention recently (Marusic & Kunkel 2003; Davidson & Krogstad 2009; Meneveau & Marusic 2013; Vassilicos et al 2015; Laval et al 2017), and has been tested and even further developed against more accurate measurements – both DNS and experiment (Morrison, McKeon & Smits 2004; Hultmark et al 2012; Rosenberg et al 2013; Sillero, Jimenez & Moser 2013; Lee & Moser 2015; Willert et al 2017).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.