Abstract

γ-titanium aluminide (TiAl) alloys with fully lamellar microstructure possess excellent properties for high-temperature applications. Such fully lamellar microstructure has interfaces at different length scales. The separation behavior of the lamellae at these interfaces is crucial for the mechanical properties of the whole material. Unfortunately, quantifying it by experiments is difficult. Therefore, we use molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to this end. Specifically, we study the high-temperature separation behavior under tensile loading of the four different kinds of lamellar interfaces appearing in TiAl, namely, the γ/α2, γ/γPT, γ/γTT, and γ/γRB interfaces. In our simulations, we use two different atomistic interface models, a defect-free (Type-1) model and a model with preexisting voids (Type-2). Clearly, the latter is more physical but studying the former also helps to understand the role of defects. Our simulation results show that among the four interfaces studied, the γ/α2 interface possesses the highest yield strength, followed by the γ/γPT, γ/γTT, and γ/γRB interfaces. For Type-1 models, our simulations reveal failure at the interface for all γ/γ interfaces but not for the γ/α2 interface. By contrast, for Type-2 models, we observe for all the four interfaces failure at the interface. Our atomistic simulations provide important data to define the parameters of traction–separation laws and cohesive zone models, which can be used in the framework of continuum mechanical modeling of TiAl. Temperature-dependent model parameters were identified, and the complete traction–separation behavior was established, in which interface elasticity, interface plasticity, and interface damage could be distinguished. By carefully eliminating the contribution of bulk deformation from the interface behavior, we were able to quantify the contribution of interface plasticity and interface damage, which can also be related to the dislocation evolution and void nucleation in the atomistic simulations.

Highlights

  • Rising concern for environmental protection demands the quest for lightweight high-temperature materials to improve fuel efficiency in civil aviation

  • The separation behavior of c/α2 and c/c interfaces under normal loading in molecular dynamics (MD) simulations is compared for the Type-1 and Type-2 interface models for target temperatures T ∈ {300K, 500K, 700K, 900K} and for the two different strain rates ε_gZlZo 109/s and ε_gZlZo 1010/s imposed by the velocities enforced on the atoms in the loading region of the simulation model

  • The high-temperature deformation behavior of the Type-1 and Type-2 single lamellar interface models has been studied here under tensile load using MD simulations. The results of these simulations were used to fit the parameters of the traction separation laws of cohesive zone models, which can be used for continuum level models, for example, using the finite element methods

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rising concern for environmental protection demands the quest for lightweight high-temperature materials to improve fuel efficiency in civil aviation. Compared to other high-temperature materials, alloys based on γ-TiAl (Appel et al, 2000) possess a high specific modulus and melting point, a low density, and excellent corrosion resistance. The FL microstructure exhibits superior creep resistance and fracture toughness (Bewlay et al, 2016). It is characterized by thin lamellae, each of which belongs to one of the two constituent intermetallic phases, the γ phase (ordered face-centered tetragonal TiAl) and the α2 phase (ordered hexagonal close-packed Ti3Al). Multiple lamellae form the socalled (grain-shaped) colonies, leading to interfaces at different length scales, namely, colony level, domain level, and lamellar level. Two types of interfaces in FL TiAl substantially affect its high-temperature deformation properties: the colony boundaries on the larger scale and the lamellar interfaces on the lowest scale, which are either of the type (c/c or c/α2)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.