Quantifying the Effects of Material Input Levels on Jointed Plain Concrete Pavement (JPCP) Performance and Slab Thickness

Abstract

The mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide (MEPDG) is a commonly accepted design principles guide that aids in jointed plain concrete pavement (JPCP) design and performance analysis. The MEPDG uses three different design parameter input levels, referred to as level one, level two, and level three, providing increasing confidence in the analysis at the lower numbered levels, which use more locally relevant (level two) or project-specific (level one) data. The state-of-the-art pavement ME software (version 2.6.2) uses MEPDG design principles to predict pavement performance. The three performance indicators for JPCP systems (international roughness index (IRI), joint faulting, and transverse cracking) experience significant changes when simulating under a different input level. The IRI and faulting indicator changed by 78 percent when using inputs varying from level one to level three, with the cracking indicator change being more severe at 87 percent. To accommodate the change in performance indicator values between input level one and input level three, increasing the concrete slab thickness is necessary to achieve comparable pavement performance. An increase in the Portland cement concrete (PCC) layer from one inch to two inches is required when input level three simulations are performed, demonstrating the economic and sustainability benefits of using project-specific level one inputs. Understanding the impact of simulation input levels will help to meet design and sustainability goals and improve the lifecycle performance of JPCP systems.