Abstract

Abstract. Harvest disturbance has substantial impacts on forest carbon (C) fluxes and stocks. The quantification of these effects is essential for the better understanding of forest C dynamics and informing forest management in the context of global change. We used a process-based forest ecosystem model, PnET-CN, to evaluate how, and by what mechanisms, clear-cuts alter ecosystem C fluxes, aboveground C stocks (AGC), and leaf area index (LAI) in northern temperate forests. We compared C fluxes and stocks predicted by the model and observed at two chronosequences of eddy covariance flux sites for deciduous broadleaf forests (DBF) and evergreen needleleaf forests (ENF) in the Upper Midwest region of northern Wisconsin and Michigan, USA. The average normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) and the Willmott index of agreement (d) for carbon fluxes, LAI, and AGC in the two chronosequences were 20% and 0.90, respectively. Simulated gross primary productivity (GPP) increased with stand age, reaching a maximum (1200–1500 g C m−2 yr−1) at 11–30 years of age, and leveled off thereafter (900–1000 g C m−2 yr−1). Simulated ecosystem respiration (ER) for both plant functional types (PFTs) was initially as high as 700–1000 g C m−2 yr−1 in the first or second year after harvesting, decreased with age (400–800 g C m−2 yr−1) before canopy closure at 10–25 years of age, and increased to 800–900 g C m−2 yr−1 with stand development after canopy recovery. Simulated net ecosystem productivity (NEP) for both PFTs was initially negative, with net C losses of 400–700 g C m−2 yr−1 for 6–17 years after clear-cuts, reaching peak values of 400–600 g C m−2 yr−1 at 14–29 years of age, and eventually stabilizing in mature forests (> 60 years old), with a weak C sink (100–200 g C m−2 yr−1). The decline of NEP with age was caused by the relative flattening of GPP and gradual increase of ER. ENF recovered more slowly from a net C source to a net sink, and lost more C than DBF. This suggests that in general ENF may be slower to recover to full C assimilation capacity after stand-replacing harvests, arising from the slower development of photosynthesis with stand age. Our model results indicated that increased harvesting intensity would delay the recovery of NEP after clear-cuts, but this had little effect on C dynamics during late succession. Future modeling studies of disturbance effects will benefit from the incorporation of forest population dynamics (e.g., regeneration and mortality) and relationships between age-related model parameters and state variables (e.g., LAI) into the model.

Highlights

  • Disturbance has been widely recognized as a key factor influencing ecosystem structure and function at decadal to century scales (Magnani et al, 2007; Williams et al, 2012; Kasischke et al, 2013)

  • Simulated C fluxes were generally consistent with EC derived C fluxes for both deciduous broadleaf forests (DBF) and evergreen needleleaf forests (ENF) sites (Figs. 1 and 2)

  • The PnET-CN model was generally able to simulate the effects of stand-replacing harvests on forest C dynamics (C fluxes and aboveground C stocks (AGC)) for two northern temperate forest chronosequences

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Disturbance has been widely recognized as a key factor influencing ecosystem structure and function at decadal to century scales (Magnani et al, 2007; Williams et al, 2012; Kasischke et al, 2013). Harvesting is an important anthropogenic disturbance shaping North American forest. W. Wang et al.: Quantifying the effects of harvesting on carbon fluxes landscapes. Harvests alter forest age structure and the forest carbon (C) cycle (Magnani et al, 2007; Pan et al, 2011; Williams et al, 2012; Zhou et al, 2013a). Quantifying the effects of harvest disturbances under the context of climate change is essential for predicting forest C dynamics, informing climate policy-making, and improving forest management. We focus on the assessment of an ecosystem model’s ability to assess the C cycle response to clear-cut harvesting

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.