Abstract
BackgroundPopulation levels of physical activity are far below recommendations limiting its public health benefits. Utility cycling (i.e. cycling for transport purposes) may be a means of increasing this activity. Empirical evidence quantifying the contribution of utility cycling to the population levels of physical activity is sparse.MethodsThe English Active People Survey (APS) was analysed to assess the likelihood of meeting UK physical activity guidelines in those who reported utility cycling compared with those who did not. Odds ratios were adjusted for important socioeconomic confounders using a logistic regression model.ResultsIn the full sample, unadjusted odds ratio for meeting physical activity guidelines in favour of utility cyclists was 5.21 (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.96–5.47) and adjusted odds ratio was 4.08 (95% CI 3.88–4.29). The odds were even higher for utility cyclists in inner London [adjusted OR: 6.08 (4.07–7.86)]. The pattern was consistent regardless of the number of activities through which people met the physical activity guideline.ConclusionUtility cycling can make a significant contribution to levels of physical activity. As an activity that can easily integrate into everyday life, utility cycling appears to be a pragmatic policy option for public health decision-makers.
Highlights
Physical activity is essential for maximal health
Utility cycling can make a significant contribution to levels of physical activity
As an activity that can integrate into everyday life, utility cycling appears to be a pragmatic policy option for public health decision-makers
Summary
Physical activity is essential for maximal health. It is associated with a 30% reduction in all-cause mortality as well as a reduction of between 20– 40% in many long-term conditions such as cardiorespiratory, metabolic, musculo-skeletal and mental health, breast and colon cancers.[1] It has been described by a Chief Medical Officer (CMO) of England as a ‘wonder drug’[2] with benefits accruing most quickly to those moving from ‘no’ activity to ‘some’ activity.[1] It is described by the Academy of Royal Colleges as a ‘miracle cure’.3. Population levels of physical activity are far below recommendations limiting its public health benefits. Empirical evidence quantifying the contribution of utility cycling to the population levels of physical activity is sparse
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have