Quantifying the contribution of tectonics vs. differential compaction in the development of domes along the Mid‐Norwegian Atlantic margin

Abstract

AbstractA sequential restoration based on combined backstripping and unfolding methods affords the opportunity to study the Cenozoic evolution of two low amplitude domes in the Mid‐Norwegian extensional margin, the Helland Hansen Arch and the Vema Dome. The integration of growth strata geometries observed in both flanks of the domes demonstrate that the structures grew by a variable combination of tectonics and differential compaction mechanisms. Sequential restoration shows that the Helland Hansen Arch grew between Early Oligocene and earliest Late Pliocene times (33–1.9 Ma). During the first phase of growth (33–9 Ma), the tectonic compression accounted for a minimum of 27% of the total dome amplitude. During Late Miocene to Pliocene times (9–1.9 Ma), differential compaction was the mechanism for dome growth. During Late Pliocene times, the Helland Hansen Arch grew with the highest rates coinciding with initial deposition of prograding wedges (3.6–1.9 Ma). In contrast, the Vema Dome started to develop in Early Eocene times and grew at a fairly constant rate up to Early Pliocene times at 3.6 Ma. The amplification of the Vema Dome took place through both differential compaction and tectonics between Early Eocene and Late Miocene times (54.8–7 Ma). The tectonic contribution accounted for a minimum of a 37% of the total dome amplitude. During Pleistocene times, the progradation of clastic wedges led to a decrease of the amplitudes of both the Helland Hansen Arch and the Vema Dome. The different timing of tectonic growth for analysed domes and arches suggest that a small and protracted phase of compression affected the Mid‐Norwegian Margin. This agrees with well‐known widespread contractional deformation affecting the Atlantic Margin of the European Plate during the Tertiary.