Abstract

A methodology is presented which can be used in the evaluation of parametric uncertainty in urban flooding simulation. Due to the fact that such simulations are time consuming, the following methodology is proposed: (a) simplification of the description of the physical process; (b) derivation of a training data set; (c) development of a data-driven surrogate model; (d) use of a forward uncertainty propagation scheme. The simplification comprises the following steps: (a) unit hydrograph derivation using a 2D hydrodynamic model; (b) calculation of the losses in order to determine the effective rainfall depth; (c) flood event simulation using the principle of the proportionality and superposition. The above methodology was implemented in an urban catchment located in the city of Athens, Greece. The model used for the first step of the simplification was FLOW-R2D, whereas the well-known SWMM software (US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA) was used for the second step of the simplification. For the training data set derivation, an ensemble of 100 Unit Hydrographs was derived with the FLOW-R2D model. The parameters which were modified in order to produce this ensemble were the Manning coefficients in the two friction zones (residential and urban open space areas). The surrogate model used to replicate the unit hydrograph derivation, using the Manning coefficients as an input, was based on the Polynomial Chaos Expansion technique. It was found that, although the uncertainties in the derived results have to be taken into account, the proposed methodology can be a fast and efficient way to cope with dynamic flood simulation in an urban catchment.

Highlights

  • Urban hydrology can be distinguished from rural hydrology, due to the fact that urban hydrology incorporates phenomena in different environments and that the dynamics of the flows are in different time scales

  • Due to the fact that urban flooding modelling is often computationally expensive, we propose that the quantification of uncertainty should follow these four steps: (a) simplification of the physical process; (b) derivation of a training data set; (c) development of a data-driven surrogate model; (d) forward uncertainty propagation

  • We used a methodology already implemented in rural catchments, which consists of the following steps: (a) the unit hydrograph of the urban catchment is derived using a 2D

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Urban hydrology can be distinguished from rural hydrology, due to the fact that urban hydrology incorporates phenomena in different environments and that the dynamics of the flows are in different time scales. There are still open challenges in modelling in this field, due to the great complexity of the urban environments, the number of processes involved in the urban water cycle, Water 2017, 9, 944; doi:10.3390/w9120944 www.mdpi.com/journal/water. Due to the complexity of the urban environment, an accurate modelling of flooding demands at least a two-dimensional (2D) approach [4]. There are several input parameters in urban hydrological models which create uncertainty. The grid resolution is of great importance and creates significant uncertainties It was beyond the scope of this paper to study the uncertainty of the grid resolution, because it is common for a flood modeller to use it as an input information provided by external sources

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call