Abstract

In August 1988, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) approved the final version of a revised rule on the acceptance of ECCS entitled “Emergency Core Cooling System; Revision to Acceptance Criteria.” The revised rule states an alternate ECCS performance analysis, based on best-estimate methods, may be used to provide more realistic estimates of plant safety margins, provided the licensee quantifies the uncertainty of the estimates and includes that uncertainty when comparing the calculated results with prescribed acceptance limits. To support the revised ECCS rule, the NRC and its contractors and consultants have developed and demonstrated a method called the Code Scaling, Applicability, and Uncertainty (CSAU) evaluation methodology. The CSAU methodology and an example application, described in this set of six papers, demonstrate that uncertainties in complex phenomena can be quantified. The methodology is structured, traceable, and practical, as is needed in the regulatory arena. It addresses in a comprehensive and systematic manner questions concerned with: (1) code capability to scale-up processes from test facility to full-scale nuclear power plant (NPP). (2) code applicability to safety studies of postulated accident scenario in a specified NPP, and (3) quantifying uncertainties of calculated results. The methodology combines a “top-down” approach to define the dominant phenomena with a “bottom-up” approach to quantify uncertainty. The methedology is able to address both: (1) uncertainties for which bias and distribution are quantifiable, and (2) uncertainties for which only a bounding value is quantifiable. The methodology is general, and therefore applicable to a variety of scenarios, plants, and codes. This paper provides an overview of the CSAU evaluation methodology and its application to a postulated cold-leg, large-break loss-of-coolant accident in a Westinghouse four-loop pressurized water reactor with 17 x 17 fuel. The code selected for this demonstration of the CSAU methodology was TRAC-PF1/MOD1, Version 14.3.

Highlights

  • In August 1988, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) approved the tinal version of a revised rule on the acceptance of emergency core cooling systems (ECCS) entitled ‘“Emergency Core Cooling System: Revision to Acceptance Criteria” (Ref. 1)

  • The background material provided here was summarized from these papers. ‘rhe acceptance criteria for ECCS performance for light-water-cooled nuclear power plants are found in tlw Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Section [50,46] (1 OCFR5O.46) (Ref. 9)

  • Included is the requirement that analysis models used to calculate the therms!-hydraulic performance of the ECCS conform to the requirements specified III,?pperrdix K (Ref. 1) to 10 CFR5O, Section

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In August 1988, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) approved the tinal version of a revised rule on the acceptance of emergency core cooling systems (ECCS) entitled ‘“Emergency Core Cooling System: Revision to Acceptance Criteria” (Ref. 1). 50.46 and Appendix K were finalized after extensive public hearings in 1973, and the rule was implemented in January 1974, The basic criteria for evaluirting ECCS performance focus on a pei]k cladding temperature (P CT) limit (2200° F or 1477 K), a limit on ttw maximum cladding oxidation (cannot exceed 17% of the cladding thickness before oxidation), a limit on the hydrogen generation from the chemical reaction of the cladding with water or steam (1?40 of po[cnti~t), a requirement that a coolable core geometry be ret~ined, and a requirement that at ccpt~blc long. These are requirements related to initii]l stored energy, US(D of [1,2] tir~~es the 1971 73 Anloric,]r~ N~lclo,~r Socioty st,ind,]rd dec;~y heat, the enwrgcncy core cool,~r]t (E CC) t)ypi]ss prescription. the prohibition on i] return to nuclcatc boiling, re

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.