Abstract

PurposeTo quantify the precision of in vivo cardiac DTI (cDTI) acquired with a spin echo, first‐ and second‐order motion‐compensated (M1M2), convex optimized diffusion encoding (CODE) sequence.MethodsFree‐breathing CODE‐M1M2 cDTI were acquired in healthy volunteers (N = 10) at midsystole and diastole with 10 repeated acquisitions per phase. 95% confidence intervals of uncertainty in reconstructed diffusion tensor eigenvectors ( , , ), mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy (FA), and tensor Mode were measured using a bootstrapping approach. Trends in observed tensor metric uncertainty were evaluated as a function of scan duration, image SNR, cardiac phase, and bulk motion artifacts.ResultsFor midsystolic scans including 5 signal averages (scan time: ∼5 min), the median myocardial 95% confidence intervals of uncertainties were: : 15.5 ± 1.2°, : 31.2 ± 3.5°, : 21.8 ± 3.1°, MD: 0.38 ± 0.02 × 10−3mm2/s, FA: 0.20 ± 0.01, and Mode: 1.10 ± 0.08. Uncertainty in all parameters increased for diastolic scans: : 31.9 ± 7.1°, : 59.6 ± 6.8°, : 40.5 ± 6.4°, MD: 0.52 ± 0.09 × 10−3 mm2/s, FA: 0.23 ± 0.01, and Mode: 1.57 ± 0.11. Diastolic cDTI also reported higher MD (MDDIA = 1.91 ± 0.34 × 10−3 mm2/s vs. MDSYS = 1.58 ± 0.09 × 10−3 mm2/s, P = 8 × 10−3) and lower FA values (FADIA = 0.32 ± 0.06 vs. FASYS = 0.37 ± 0.03, P = 0.03) .ConclusioncDTI precision improved with increasing nondiffusion‐weighted (b = 0) image SNR, but gains were minimal for SNR ≥ 25 (∼10 averages). cDTI precision was also sensitive to intershot bulk motion artifacts, which led to better precision for midsystolic imaging.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call