Abstract

In cosmetic surgery, bridging the anticipation gap between the patients and the physicians can be challenging if there lacks objective and transparent information exchange during the decision-making and surgical process. Among all factors, facial symmetry is the most important for assessing facial attractiveness. The aim of this work is to promote communications between the two parties by providing a quadruple of quantitative measurements: overall asymmetry index (oAI), asymmetry vector, classification, and confidence vector, using an artificial neural network classifier to model people’s perception acquired from visual questionnaires concerning facial asymmetry. The questionnaire results exhibit a Cronbach’s Alpha value of 0.94 and categorize the respondents’ perception of each stimulus face into perceived normal (PN), perceived asymmetrically normal (PAN), and perceived abnormal (PA) categories. The trained classifier yields an overall root mean squared error < 0.01, and its result shows that the oAI is, in general, proportional to the degree of perceived asymmetry. However, there exist faces that are difficult to classify as either PN or PAN or either PAN or PA with competing confidence values. In such cases, oAI alone is not sufficient to articulate facial asymmetry. Assisting surgeon–patient conversations with the proposed asymmetry quadruple is advised to avoid or to mitigate potential medical disputes.

Highlights

  • Appearance is the most prominent stimulus to establish an impression in others [1].Rubenstein et al showed that humans develop their capability of perceiving attractiveness as early as in their infancy [2]

  • Among the 64 stimulus faces, 9 faces are classified as perceived normal (PN) (14%), 15 faces are classified as perceived asymmetrically normal (PAN) (23%), and 40 faces are classified as perceived abnormal (PA) (63%)

  • We construct an artificial neural network model to address the perception of facial asymmetry

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rubenstein et al showed that humans develop their capability of perceiving attractiveness as early as in their infancy [2]. Cross-cultural and cross-age similarities exist in judging facial attractiveness [3]. Facial symmetry is the most important factor that correlates facial attractiveness [4,5,6,7,8]. Perfect facial symmetry is only considered a theoretical existence, as most attractive individuals exhibit an asymmetric facial nature [9]. Significant facial asymmetry can introduce aesthetic or even functional problems [10]. Cheong and Lo articulated the etiology of facial asymmetry as being congenital, developmental, or acquired; the clinical implications, evaluation, and treatment planning and management may vary [5,11]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call