Abstract

Catastrophic wildfires are often a result of dynamic fire behaviours. They can cause rapid escalation of fire behaviour, increasing the danger to ground-based emergency personnel. To date, few studies have characterised merging fire behaviours outside the laboratory. The aim of this study was to develop a simple, fast and accurate method to track fire front propagation using emerging technologies to quantify merging fire behaviour at the field scale. Medium-scale field experiments were conducted during April 2019 on harvested wheat fields in western Victoria, Australia. An unmanned aerial vehicle was used to capture high-definition video imagery of fire propagation. Twenty-one junction and five inward parallel fire fronts were identified during the experiments. The rate of spread (ROS) of junction fire fronts was found to be at least 60% higher than head fire fronts. Thirty-eight per cent of junction fire fronts had increased ROS at the final stage of the merging process. Furthermore, the angle between two junction fire fronts did not change significantly in time for initial angles of 4–14°. All these results contrast with previous published work. Further investigation is required to explain the results as the relationship between fuel load, wind speed and scale is not known.

Highlights

  • Extreme fire events (EFEs) (Tedim et al 2018) have become more regular around the world

  • The junction fire fronts identified were separated into four groups depending on the recorded initial angle between oblique fire fronts yin: 4–148, 28–348, 40–598 and 778

  • The rate of spread (ROS) of junction, linear and parallel fire fronts was calculated as an average of all 2- and 5-s time intervals (Fig. 8)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Extreme fire events (EFEs) (Tedim et al 2018) have become more regular around the world. EFEs create disproportionate risks to environmental and human assets as they can result in many casualties and loss of property. In most cases, these consequences are a result of dynamic fire behaviours (Viegas 2012; Filkov et al 2018; Tedim et al 2018; Filkov et al 2020a). Erratic behaviour and difficulties in suppression allow fires to burn more intensely over larger areas, increasing the likelihood of loss of life, property and other assets

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call