Quantifying longitudinal cognitive resilience to Alzheimer’s disease and other neuropathologies

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundCognitive resilience (CR) has been defined as the continuum of better (or worse) than expected cognition, given the degree of neuropathology. To quantify this concept, existing approaches focus on either cognitive level at a single timepoint (Figure 1A) or slopes of cognitive decline (Figure 1B).MethodIn a prospective study of 1,215 participants, we created a continuous measure of CR defined as the mean of differences between estimated person‐specific and marginal cognitive levels over time, after accounting for neuropathologies (Figure 1C).ResultNeuroticism and depressive symptoms were associated with all CR measures (P‐values<.012); as expected, cognitive activity and education were only associated with the cognitive‐level approaches (P‐values<.0002). However, compared with the existing CR measures focusing on a single measure or slopes of cognition, our new measure yielded stronger relations with risk factors.ConclusionDefining CR based on the longitudinal differences between person‐specific and marginal cognitive levels is a novel and complementary way to quantify CR.