Quantifying GFAP immunohistochemistry in the brain – Introduction of the Reactivity score (R-score) and how it compares to other methodologies

Abstract

BackgroundImmunohistochemical upregulation of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is commonly used to detect astrogliosis in tissue sections and includes measurement of intensity and/or distribution of staining. There remains a lack of standard objective measures when diagnosing astrogliosis and its severity. New methodAim was to test a novel semi-quantitative assessment of GFAP which we term reactivity (R)-score, on its reproducibility and sensitivity to measure astrogliosis. The R-score, which is based on the proportion of astrocytes seen at each level of reactivity, was compared to 3 other commonly employed quantification methods in research: (1) thresholding, (2) point-counting, and (3) qualitative grading. Sub-regions of the hippocampus, medulla, and cerebellum were studied in piglet, and 4 human cases with clinically reported astrogliosis. Intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) and percentage agreement cut-offs of ≤ 20% and ≥ 75% were used respectively to compare amongst the methods, with outcome measures being reproducibility across serial and non-serial sections, resilience to changes in experimental conditions, and inter- and intra-rater concordance. ResultsAveraged across 3 brain regions, the intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) was 5% for R-score, with inter and intra-rater kappa scores being 0.99 and 0.95 respectively. Comparison with existing methods and conclusionsBased on CV values, the R-score was superior to thresholding (CV of 51%) and point-counting (CV of 16%), with the qualitative grade being found to be on par (percentage agreement 95%). Given the ease, reproducibility and selectivity of the R-score, we propose its validity in future research purposes and clinical application.