Abstract

Summary Quantification of ecosystem services is increasingly valuable for conservation and restoration decision‐making. Structured habitats serve as nursery grounds by enhancing juvenile fish and mobile crustacean survival and abundance. This service is challenging to quantify due to ontogenetic shifts in habitat use by many species. We reviewed available literature on the increased abundance of juvenile fish and mobile crustaceans in a key nursery habitat – Crassostrea virginica reefs in the USA. We modelled the growth and mortality of the enhanced species using three different natural mortality (M) estimates to provide estimates of the gross and net lifetime production and uncertainty that can be attributed to the habitat. Recruitment of nineteen and twelve species were found to be enhanced by the addition of C. virginica reefs to previously unstructured habitat in the Gulf of Mexico and the South Atlantic and Mid‐Atlantic USA, respectively. This increased recruitment is estimated to result in a mean lifetime enhancement in production of 397 ± 115 (1 SD) g m−2 year−1 in the Gulf of Mexico and 281 ± 56 g m−2 year−1 in the South Atlantic and Mid‐Atlantic. The two regions differed with regard to the identity of the enhanced species and their degree of augmentation. Thus, our results highlight the inadequacy of applying regional estimates of ecosystem services to global scales. Furthermore, estimates of total enhancement varied by up to a factor of 2·8 across the three methods of M estimation. Our estimates are quantitative predictions of the ecological benefits derived from the restoration or conservation of a threatened habitat, and advance the field of restoration science beyond qualitative statements that just predict direction of benefit (e.g. increased or decreased). Quantification of the uncertainty in the production estimates further increases their utility for decision‐makers. Synthesis and applications. Our results can be applied to the restoration or conservation of nursery habitats where habitat is limiting the recruitment of fish species. Quantitative estimates of fisheries productivity enhancement by habitats can be used by managers to determine the expected return on investment in restoration activities, provide testable predictions for monitoring programs and communicate the value of restoring or conserving habitat.

Highlights

  • Advancing a wider societal recognition of the ecological importance of biogenic habitats has been a majorThe lack of models to quantify benefits is a problem ubiquitous across many ecosystem services

  • We reviewed available literature on the increased abundance of juvenile fish and mobile crustaceans in a key nursery habitat – Crassostrea virginica reefs in the USA

  • We assumed that soft sediments were not limiting in these systems, and that the presence or restoration of oyster reefs did not decrease the populations of species utilizing soft sediment habitats

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Advancing a wider societal recognition of the ecological importance of biogenic habitats has been a majorThe lack of models to quantify benefits is a problem ubiquitous across many ecosystem services. Basing models on meta-analyses is one solution to bridging the gap from fine- to coarserscale application of studies Structured coastal habitats such as oyster reefs, seagrass meadows and saltmarshes have been shown to support enhanced abundances of juvenile fish and invertebrates compared to adjacent unstructured areas (Heck, Hays & Orth 2003). Assuming the supply of larvae does not limit population size (see review by Caley et al 1996), nursery habitats can mediate the population dynamics of enhanced fish (Juanes 2007) Recognition of this important function of structured habitats and their role as foraging areas for older age classes of fish has resulted in efforts to protect them. Quantification of the augmentation in fish productivity across scales and over time, and estimates of the uncertainty in this service are needed to guide decision-making, which often seeks to maximize the return on investment of restoration and conservation activities

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call