Abstract

Abstract. Wind-profiling lidars are now regularly used in boundary-layer meteorology and in applications such as wind energy and air quality. Lidar wind profilers exploit the Doppler shift of laser light backscattered from particulates carried by the wind to measure a line-of-sight (LOS) velocity. The Doppler beam swinging (DBS) technique, used by many commercial systems, considers measurements of this LOS velocity in multiple radial directions in order to estimate horizontal and vertical winds. The method relies on the assumption of homogeneous flow across the region sampled by the beams. Using such a system in inhomogeneous flow, such as wind turbine wakes or complex terrain, will result in errors. To quantify the errors expected from such violation of the assumption of horizontal homogeneity, we simulate inhomogeneous flow in the atmospheric boundary layer, notably stably stratified flow past a wind turbine, with a mean wind speed of 6.5 m s−1 at the turbine hub-height of 80 m. This slightly stable case results in 15° of wind direction change across the turbine rotor disk. The resulting flow field is sampled in the same fashion that a lidar samples the atmosphere with the DBS approach, including the lidar range weighting function, enabling quantification of the error in the DBS observations. The observations from the instruments located upwind have small errors, which are ameliorated with time averaging. However, the downwind observations, particularly within the first two rotor diameters downwind from the wind turbine, suffer from errors due to the heterogeneity of the wind turbine wake. Errors in the stream-wise component of the flow approach 30% of the hub-height inflow wind speed close to the rotor disk. Errors in the cross-stream and vertical velocity components are also significant: cross-stream component errors are on the order of 15% of the hub-height inflow wind speed (1.0 m s−1) and errors in the vertical velocity measurement exceed the actual vertical velocity. By three rotor diameters downwind, DBS-based assessments of wake wind speed deficits based on the stream-wise velocity can be relied on even within the near wake within 1.0 m s−1 (or 15% of the hub-height inflow wind speed), and the cross-stream velocity error is reduced to 8% while vertical velocity estimates are compromised. Measurements of inhomogeneous flow such as wind turbine wakes are susceptible to these errors, and interpretations of field observations should account for this uncertainty.

Highlights

  • Since the emergence of a modern generation of lidar wind profilers in the mid-2000s, several commercial products have entered the market and have gained wide use for wind energy, air quality, and urban meteorology applications

  • Using large-eddy simulation (LES) of stable atmospheric boundary-layer flow past a wind turbine, we have quantified the error expected from observations collected using the Doppler beam swinging (DBS) measurement approach in the vicinity of a wind turbine wake

  • Lated by the LES are converted into LOS velocities representative of lidar technology using four beams, an appropriate lidar range weighting function, and the DBS method

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the emergence of a modern generation of lidar wind profilers in the mid-2000s, several commercial products have entered the market and have gained wide use for wind energy, air quality, and urban meteorology applications. DBS methods have been used with sodar (Barthelmie et al, 2003) and lidar (Nygaard, 2011; Rhodes and Lundquist, 2013; Kumer et al, 2013) to characterize wind turbine wakes, the error in DBS measurements of wind turbine wakes has not yet been quantified Approaches to quantifying this error have been explored for flow in complex terrain, but not in the context of the inhomogeneous flow near a turbine wake. LES CFD has not been used to simulate the wind fields as retrieved by lidar with DBS, LES CFD can quantify the uncertainty in measurements resulting from very inhomogeneous flow such as turbine wakes within the degree of uncertainty of the model.

Data and methods
Simulations of the stably stratified atmospheric boundary layer
Lidar simulator method
Quantification of DBS error in turbine wakes
Global error and the effect of averaging time
Error as a function of distance downstream
Error as a function of distance across the wake
Velocity error as a function of height along the wake centerline
Velocity error profiles across the wake
Findings
Discussion and conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call