Abstract

Activated carbons (AC) from lignocellulosic biomass feedstocks are used in a broad range of applications, especially for electrochemical devices such as supercapacitor electrodes. Limited studies of environmental and economic impacts for AC supercapacitor production have been conducted. Thus, this paper evaluated the environmental and economic impacts of AC produced from lignocellulosic biomass for energy-storage purposes. The life cycle assessment (LCA) was employed to quantify the potential environmental impacts associated with AC production via the proposed processes including feedstock establishment, harvest, transport, storage, and in-plant production. A techno-economic model was constructed to analyze the economic feasibility of AC production, which included the processes in the proposed technology, as well as the required facility installation and management. A base case, together with two alternative scenarios of KOH-reuse and steam processes for carbon activation, were evaluated for both environmental and economic impacts, while the uncertainty of the net present value (NPV) of the AC production was examined with seven economic indicators. Our results indicated that overall “in-plant production” process presented the highest environmental impacts. Normalized results of the life-cycle impact assessment showed that the AC production had environmental impacts mainly on the carcinogenics, ecotoxicity, and non-carcinogenics categories. We then further focused on life cycle analysis from raw biomass delivery to plant gate, the results showed that “feedstock establishment” had the most significant environmental impact, ranging from 50.3% to 85.2%. For an activated carbon plant producing 3000 kg AC per day in the base case, the capital cost would be USD 6.66 million, and annual operation cost was found to be USD 15.46 million. The required selling price (RSP) of AC was USD 16.79 per kg, with the discounted payback period (DPB) of 9.98 years. Alternative cases of KOH-reuse and steam processes had GHG emissions of 15.4 kg CO2 eq and 10.2 kg CO2 eq for every 1 kg of activated carbon, respectively. Monte Carlo simulation showed 49.96% of the probability for an investment to be profitable in activated carbon production from lignocellulosic biomass for supercapacitor electrodes.

Highlights

  • Lignocellulosic materials such as energy grasses and woody biomass are widely recognized as environmentally friendly feedstocks for value-added bioproducts [1], including for bioenergy products [2] and carbon sequestration [3], and as an essential element for the production of active carbon-based material [4]

  • Among the variety of carbonaceous materials such as carbon aerogel, activated carbon [8], and carbon nanotubes [9] studied for supercapacitor electrodes, activated carbon is the most widely used material, mainly because of its cost effectiveness, good conductivity, and potential environmental sustainability [10]

  • Despite the fact that carbon electrodes are mostly produced from nonrenewable materials such as coal and petroleum, lignocellulosic biomass is known as a renewable and inexpensive feedstock for Activated Carbon (AC)-based supercapacitor electrodes [11,12]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Lignocellulosic materials such as energy grasses and woody biomass are widely recognized as environmentally friendly feedstocks for value-added bioproducts [1], including for bioenergy products [2] and carbon sequestration [3], and as an essential element for the production of active carbon-based material [4]. Utilizing biomass to develop alternative energy-storage devices with high energy densities is a viable solution due to the uncertainty of fossil fuels and increased environmental concerns [5]. Despite the fact that carbon electrodes are mostly produced from nonrenewable materials such as coal and petroleum, lignocellulosic biomass is known as a renewable and inexpensive feedstock for Activated Carbon (AC)-based supercapacitor electrodes [11,12]. Compared to fossil fuels, renewable biomass material is more sustainable in terms of producing activated carbon in the future. The value-added utilization of biomass could facilitate the development of the rural bioeconomy

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call