Quantifying aortic valve regurgitation in patients with congenital aortic valve disease by 2D and 4D flow magnetic resonance analysis

Abstract

BackgroundIn congenital aortic valve disease, quantifying aortic regurgitation (AR) varies by the measurement site. Our study aimed to identify the optimal site for AR assessment using 2D and 4D MR flow measurements, with a focus on vortices. MethodsWe retrospectively analysed 31 patients with congenital aortic valve disease, performing 2D and 4D MR flow measurements at the aortic valve, sinotubular junction (STJ), ascending aorta (AAo), and using midpulmonary artery measurements as a reference.We assessed percentage AR and net forward volumes, calculated linear correlations, and plotted Bland-Altman plots. Net forward flow at all aortic sites were correlated with the main pulmonary artery. Differences in AR between 2D and 4D flows were linked to vortices detected by 4D streamlines. ResultsThe best agreement in % AR between 2D and 4D flows was at the aortic valve (mean difference 4D2D -2.9%, limits of agreement 8.7% to −14.3%; r2 = 0.7). Correlations weakened at STJ and AAo. Vortices in the ascending aorta led to AR overestimation in 2D measurements. Net forward flow at the aortic valve by 4D flow correlated closer with main pulmonary artery than did 2D flow. (Mean difference for 2D and 4D MR flow 7.5 ml and 4.2 ml, respectively). ConclusionsFor congenital aortic valve disease, the most accurate AR quantification occurs at the aortic valve using 2D and 4D MR flow. Notably, vortices in the ascending aorta can result in AR overestimation with 2D MR flow.