Abstract
Comprehending natural language quantifiers (like many, all, or some) involves linguistic and numerical abilities. However, the extent to which both factors play a role is controversial. In order to determine the specific contributions of linguistic and number skills in quantifier comprehension, we examined two groups of participants that differ in their language abilities while their number skills appear to be similar: Participants with Down syndrome (DS) and participants with Williams syndrome (WS). Compared to rather poor linguistic skills of individuals with DS, individuals with WS display relatively advanced language abilities. Participants with WS also outperformed participants with DS in a quantifier comprehension task while number knowledge did not differ between the two groups. When compared to typically developing (TD) children of the same mental age, participants with WS displayed similar levels regarding quantifier abilities, but participants with DS performed worse than the control group. Language abilities but not number skills also significantly predicted quantifier knowledge in a linear regression analysis, stressing the importance of linguistic abilities for quantifier comprehension. In addition to determining the skills that are relevant for comprehending quantifiers, our findings provide the first demonstration of how quantifiers are acquired by individuals with DS and WS, an issue not investigated so far.
Highlights
Many a true word is spoken in jest
In order to disentangle the specific contributions of linguistic vs. number skills in quantifier comprehension, we tested participants with Down syndrome (DS) and Williams syndrome (WS) who display comparable numerical
Quantifier comprehension is linked to linguistic skills skills but who differ in their language abilities
Summary
Many a true word is spoken in jest. In order to properly comprehend quantifiers, various skills are required. If a person confesses that she ate all of the cookies, semantic knowledge of the term all is needed to infer that none of the cookies will be left for you. If a person confesses that she ate some cookies, this entails she did not eat all of the cookies (otherwise the utterance would violate the pragmatic principle of informativeness, [1]). If a person confesses she ate both cookies, you know that she ate exactly two (not three, four, or any other number).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.