Abstract

The purpose of this study was to quantify load across an entire season for professional youth football players and assess the effects of stage of season, playing position and training day relative to match day (MD). Data from ratings of perceived exertion and seven global positioning system (GPS) derived measures of external training load were collected from 20 players across a 47-week season. Mixed linear models were used to assess the effects of stage of season, training proximity to match day (e.g. MD-1, MD-2) and position across each dependent variable. Training proximity to match day was found to have the most substantive effect with effect sizes ranging from small ([Formula: see text] to large ([Formula: see text]. Across training load measures, mean values collected on match day were on average 47% higher than all other sessions. Whilst significant regression coefficients were obtained for playing position (p ≤ 0.003) and stage of season (p ≤ 0.049), effect sizes were close to zero ([Formula: see text]in each instance. This study provides insight into the season-long training and match-play demands of a professional youth football team. It highlights the significant impact of match-play on load and supports the use of multiple methods of collecting training load data. Overall, there was limited variation in mean values of dependent variables across playing position, stage of the season and loading during midweek training. These findings highlight the need for future research to investigate whether greater systematic variations in training load can be used to increase physical fitness and maximise physical performance during competition.

Highlights

  • Exposing athletes to an appropriate training stimulus can create diverse physiological adaptations of the cardiovascular, muscular and aerobic systems, specific to the nature of their competition.[1]

  • A survey of 41 professional clubs reported that all organisations collected heart-rate and global positioning system (GPS) data from every field-training session and a large proportion collected rating of perceived exertion (RPE) or other subjective ratings of load.[6]

  • Subjective measures of training load were collected via RPE, whereas objective measures of training load were collected via GPS units worn during training and matches

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Exposing athletes to an appropriate training stimulus can create diverse physiological adaptations of the cardiovascular, muscular and aerobic systems, specific to the nature of their competition.[1]. Highlighting variables measured during both training and match play, it was Reviewers: Chris Bishop (Middlesex University, UK) James Malone (Liverpool Hope University, UK)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call