Abstract

This paper presents the results of a study evaluating the human perception of the noise produced by four different small quadcopter unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). This study utilised measurements and recordings of the noise produced by the quadcopter UAVs in hover and in constant-speed flight at a fixed altitude. Measurements made using a ½″ microphone were used to calculate a range of different noise metrics for each noise event. Noise recordings were also made using a spherical microphone array (an Eigenmike system). The recordings were reproduced using a 3D sound reproduction system installed in a large anechoic chamber located at The University of Auckland. Thirty-seven participants were subjected to the recordings and asked to rate their levels of annoyance in response to the noise, and asked to perform a simple cognitive task in order to assess the level of distraction caused by the noise. This study discusses the noise levels measured during the test and how the various noise metrics relate to the annoyance ratings. It was found that annoyance strongly correlates with the sound pressure level and loudness metrics, and that there is a very strong correlation between the annoyance caused by a UAV in hover and in flyby at the same height. While some significant differences between the distraction caused by the UAV noise for different cases were observed in the cognitive distraction test, the results were inconclusive. This was likely due to a ceiling effect observed in the participants’ test scores.

Highlights

  • Dotterel Technologies Ltd., 40 Kenwyn Street, Parnell, Auckland 1052, New Zealand; Abstract: This paper presents the results of a study evaluating the human perception of the noise produced by four different small quadcopter unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)

  • A quadcopter UAV operating in hover or flyby will have an even more complex directivity pattern, which will likely vary with the angle through which the propeller blades rotate due to the noise caused by the unsteady loading on the propeller blades and acoustic interference between the sound from each propeller

  • The polar angle is defined as the angle the ray from the microphone to the centre of the UAV makes with the vertical axis—with θ = 0◦ being directly above the UAV, θ = 90◦ being in the plane of the UAV rotors and θ = 180◦ being directly below the UAV

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dotterel Technologies Ltd., 40 Kenwyn Street, Parnell, Auckland 1052, New Zealand; Abstract: This paper presents the results of a study evaluating the human perception of the noise produced by four different small quadcopter unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). While some significant differences between the distraction caused by the UAV noise for different cases were observed in the cognitive distraction test, the results were inconclusive. This was likely due to a ceiling effect observed in the participants’ test scores. The noise generated by UAVs is unique and does not resemble the noise produced by other common community-noise sources such as automobiles and conventional aircraft [5,6] Because of their likely use in highly populated areas, UAV operations can be expected to alter existing soundscapes and affect people living within these areas [6]. Torija and Clark [1] state that “noise is one of the main limiting factors for public acceptance andstate adoption of UAVs”

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call