Abstract
The segmented semiconductor detectors for transmitted electrons in ultrahigh resolution scanning electron microscopes allow observing samples in various imaging modes. Typically, two standard modes of objective lens, with and without a magnetic field, differ by their resolution. If the beam deceleration mode is selected, then an electrostatic field around the sample is added. The trajectories of transmitted electrons are influenced by the fields below the sample. The goal of this paper is a quantification of measured images and theoretical study of the capability of the detector to collect signal electrons by its individual segments. Comparison of measured and ray-traced simulated data were difficult in the past. This motivated us to present a new method that enables better comparison of the two datasets at the cost of additional measurements, so-called calibration curves. Furthermore, we also analyze the measurements acquired using 2D pixel array detector (PAD) that provide a more detailed angular profile. We demonstrate that the radial profiles of STEM and/or 2D-PAD data are sensitive to material composition. Moreover, scattering processes are affected by thickness of the sample as well. Hence, comparing the two experimental and simulation data can help to estimate composition or the thickness of the sample.
Highlights
Introductiontransmitted electrons (TEs) collected near the optical axes give the bright-field (BF) image
We show that none of them lead to a reliable comparison with the segmented scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM)
The two materials, carbon and molybdenum, that we analyzed with a STEM detector have nominal thicknesses of 100 nm (C) and 110 nm (Mo) and for that reason we used a landing energy of 15 keV, at which we have a sufficient signal of transmitted electrons (TEs)
Summary
TEs collected near the optical axes give the bright-field (BF) image. These electrons have either not been scattered at all, direct beam, or have been (in)elastically scattered through angles of milliradians or less. The HAADF signal depends on density and thickness of the sample and it is proportional to the nth power of the atomic number Z [3,4]. Deviations from this simple power law of (effective) Z have been reported for small detection angles and heavy elements [5]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.