Abstract
The prognosis of children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is improving but still unsatisfactory. We and others have shown that measurable residual disease (MRD) as measured with multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) is a very strong prognostic factor, however this technique cannot reliably identify low-risk cases. An alternative approach for MRD analysis is quantification of leukemia-specific transcripts using reverse transcription followed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). This approach has shown strong prognostic value in adult AML but its significance in childhood AML is less studied. In this retrospective study, we evaluated early treatment response with RT-qPCR and MFC in parallel to determine treatment kinetics and the relationship between results of the two methods. The study included 15 children (7 females, 8 males, median age 6 years (range 1-16)), diagnosed 2004-2011 with de novo AML with a quantifiable fusion transcript (8 with RUNX1-RUNX1T1, one with CBFB-MYH11 and 6 with KMT2A-MLLT3), all treated in the NOPHO AML-2004 trial. MRD analyses were performed on samples from day 15 from start of the first induction course and just before the first consolidation course. MRD analysis with MFC was performed in bone marrow samples by identifying leukemia-associated immunophenotypes (LAIP), and reported as percent of viable cells. Fusion transcripts were analyzed with RT-qPCR in bone marrow and blood according to the Europe against cancer program, and reported as percentage of diagnostic level in bone marrow. Results of all MRD analyses were reported to clinicians but not used for treatment decisions. All patients achieved complete remission. 9 patients relapsed (median time from diagnosis 12 months, range 8-16); 5 with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and 4 with KMT2A-MLLT3. When we compared results of RT-qPCR in blood and bone marrow day 15 and before consolidation, there was a high correlation; 0.93, p<0.01. When 0.1% was used as cut-off for positivity, 20/22 samples were concordant (Cohens kappa test K value 0.818, P<0.001) with the two disconcordant samples positive in bone marrow but negative in blood before consolidation. Of the concordant samples, 9 were ≥0.1% and 11 were <0.1% in both bone marrow and blood. There was no significant correlation between results obtained with MFC and RT-qPCR, neither in bone marrow nor in blood. When comparing MFC and RT-qPCR results in bone marrow using the 0.1% cut-off, only 12 of 22 samples were concordant (4/10 at day 15, 8/12 before consolidation, in total 55% agreement; K value 0.141, P=0.36). Most discordant results (9/10) were ≥0.1% with RT-qPCR but negative (<0.1%) with MFC. There was a pattern of slower treatment kinetics with higher MRD results obtained with RT-qPCR than MFC. In cases with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 fusion transcript levels were 22% (median, range 12-63%) of diagnostic value day 15 and 0.03% (0-1.4%) before consolidation. In cases with KMT2A/MLLT3, the corresponding levels were 15% (0 - 40%) and 0 (0-0.038%). There was no difference in relapse frequency between children with fusion transcripts ≥0.1% or <0.1% day 15. On the other hand, two patients with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 fusion transcript level ≥0.1% but negative with MFC before consolidation both relapsed. In order to find the reason for remaining high levels of fusion transcripts day 15 when the bone marrow is usually hypoplastic, we reanalyzed flow cytometry files from four cases with remaining fusion transcript >0.1%. These analyses confirmed the absence of immature cells with LAIP and detected either more mature myeloid cells or immature cells without LAIP. We hypothesize that fusion transcripts can be present in mature cells not detected as MRD using MFC. This was supported by analyzing sorted immature and mature cells from bone marrow samples at diagnosis of AML (n=4, adults). In CD34-CD117+ cells, leukemic transcripts (RUNX1-RUNX1T1/CBFB-MYH11/mutated NPM1) were 67±10% (mean±SEM) of the level in the most immature cells, CD34+CD117+, from the same patients and in mature granulocytes (CD34-CD117-, high SSC) 88±9%. In conclusion, RT-qPCR and MFC provide different information during induction treatment. RT-qPCR has a stronger ability to detect remaining leukemic burden, but whether this burden is clinically relevant remains to be shown. The impact of fusion transcript levels on relapse risk is currently investigated in the NOPHO-DBH AML-2012 trial in which MFC is used for risk stratification. DisclosuresNo relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.