Abstract

Uncontrolled movement of instruments in laparoscopic surgery can lead to inadvertent tissue damage, particularly when the dissecting or electrosurgical instrument is located outside the field of view of the laparoscopic camera. The incidence and relevance of such events are currently unknown. The present work aims to identify and quantify potentially dangerous situations using the example of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Twenty-four final year medical students were prompted to each perform four consecutive LC attempts on a well-established box trainer in a surgical training environment following a standardized protocol in a porcine model. The following situation was defined as a critical event (CE): the dissecting instrument was inadvertently located outside the laparoscopic camera’s field of view. Simultaneous activation of the electrosurgical unit was defined as a highly critical event (hCE). Primary endpoint was the incidence of CEs. While performing 96 LCs, 2895 CEs were observed. Of these, 1059 (36.6%) were hCEs. The median number of CEs per LC was 20.5 (range: 1–125; IQR: 33) and the median number of hCEs per LC was 8.0 (range: 0–54, IQR: 10). Mean total operation time was 34.7 min (range: 15.6–62.5 min, IQR: 14.3 min). Our study demonstrates the significance of CEs as a potential risk factor for collateral damage during LC. Further studies are needed to investigate the occurrence of CE in clinical practice, not just for laparoscopic cholecystectomy but also for other procedures. Systematic training of future surgeons as well as technical solutions address this safety issue.

Highlights

  • Despite its undeniable advantages [1], the introduction of minimally invasive surgical techniques has increased the complexity of surgical procedures because of the transmission of visual information via laparoscopic imaging

  • Inappropriate camera settings and uncontrolled movement of the instruments can lead to inadvertent injury of adjacent structures [3, 4], especially when the dissecting instrument is actuated outside the field of view of the laparoscopic camera [5]

  • Inclusion criteria were no practical experience in laparoscopic surgery and voluntary written consent to participate in the study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite its undeniable advantages [1], the introduction of minimally invasive surgical techniques has increased the complexity of surgical procedures because of the transmission of visual information via laparoscopic imaging. Laparoscopic instruments are not always located within the surgeon’s direct field of view and yet need to be steered in a three-dimensional space via the presented digital image section [2]. Inappropriate camera settings and uncontrolled movement of the instruments can lead to inadvertent injury of adjacent structures [3, 4], especially when the dissecting instrument is actuated outside the field of view of the laparoscopic camera [5]. Slipping off or tearing tissue can cause sudden and uncontrolled flinging movements of the effector outside the laparoscopic field of view while the electrosurgical device is still activated

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call