Abstract

69 doubtful and positive patch test readings (?+21, +23, ++18, 7) in 15 contact dermatitis patients were studied by measurement of skin thickness as an expression of allergic oedema. Exposed skin was compared with a regional control. Skin thickness was measured by 15 MHz pulsed ultrasound (A-scan) to 0.1 mm accuracy. The ?+, +, ++, and reactions could be separated by measurements of absolute difference in thickness (p less than 0.001, p less than 0.001, p less than 0.02) between exposed and non-exposed skin; the mean increases were 0.14, 0.49, 0.93, and 1.37 mm. The ?+, +, and ++ reactions, but not the reactions, could also be separated by measurements of relative increase in skin thickness (p less than 0.001, p less than 0.001, n.s.); the mean increases were 7%, 25%, 50% and 55%. The normal thickness of the skin of the back was shown to have increased (p less than 0.02) in patients with reactions only. It is concluded that the high-frequency ultrasound method is suitable for quantification of doubtful and positive patch test reactions. The reactions are probably explained by the normal thick skin of the back, and they need no separate recording in patch testing. Standards of increase in skin thickness in doubtful and positive patch tests are defined: absolute increase (mm) was ?+ less than or equal to 0.2; +0.3-0.7; ++0.8-1.3 ( greater than or equal to 1.4); relative increases were ?+ less than 15%; +15-45%, ++ ( included) greater than 45%.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.