Abstract

This study assesses the formation and stability of the water contaminant 7,9-di‑tert‑butyl‑1-oxaspiro(4,5)deca-6,9-diene-2,8‑dione ([1]) which repeatedly occurs in the migration waters of cross-linked polyethylene (PE-X) pipes. In aqueous solution [1] is partially transformed to 3-(3,5-di‑tert‑butyl‑1‑hydroxy-4-oxo-2,5-cyclohexadien-1-yl)propionic acid ([2]). For a better understanding of the formation of [1] and its transformation into [2] an analytical method was established to allow the analysis of both species separately. Because of thermal instability [2] cannot be detected with GC-MS. Therefore, two methods were validated for a reliable and reproducible quantification: GC-MS for [1] and HPLC-MS/MS for both [1] and [2]. Comparative measurements of migration waters from PE-X pipes using GC-MS and HPLC-MS/MS methods showed that the concentrations of [1] detected with GC-MS corresponds to the sum of [1] and [2] measured with HPLC-MS/MS. In the migration waters [1] was detected in higher concentrations than [2]. The highest concentrations of [1], detected with GC-MS, were > 300µg/L. The longer the materials are stored without contact with water, the more [1] is measured in the migration waters. Most of the previous values reported in the literature for [1] were based on semi-quantification. Hence, we compared results of the semi-quantitative determination according to EN 15768 with those of a quantitative method with a standard. The results gained with the semi-quantitative method represent less than 50% of the quantified values for the amount leaching from the pipes, which means that the semi-quantification method according to EN 15768 leads to a significant underestimation of [1]. Finally, stability assessment showed that [1] developed an equilibrium with [2] under acidic conditions, whereas it will completely be transferred to [2] at pH 10. At pH 7, it takes more than 50 days for [1] to reach an equilibrium with [2]. However, at increasing the temperature to 60°C, [1] will be rapidly transformed into [2]. Besides [1] and [2], other currently unknown degradation products are formed. As there is no comprehensive toxicological assessment for both substances available today, our findings underline the need for regulatory consequences.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call