Abstract

Histories of statistics and quantification have demonstrated that systems of statistical knowledge participate in the construction of the objects that are measured. However, the pace, purpose, and scope of quantification in state bureaucracy have expanded greatly over the past decades, fuelled by (neoliberal) societal trends that have given the social phenomenon of quantification a central place in political discussions and in the public sphere. This is particularly the case in the field of education. In this article, we ask what is at stake in state bureaucracy, professional practice, and individual pupils as quantification increasingly permeates the education field. We call for a theoretical renewal in order to understand quantification as a social phenomenon in education. We propose a sociology-of-knowledge approach to the phenomenon, drawing on different theoretical traditions in the sociology of knowledge in France (Alain Desrosières and Laurent Thévenot), England (Barry Barnes and Donald MacKenzie), and Canada (Ian Hacking), and argue that the ongoing quantification practice at different levels of the education system can be understood as cultural processes of self-fulfilling prophecies.

Highlights

  • We live in an age of quantification

  • We reflect on what is at stake for society and the individual when quantification and statistics become a part of state bureaucracy, professional practice, and young people’s everyday lives

  • We argue that the strong theory of performativity and self-fulfilling prophecy (Barnes, Desrosieres, Hacking, MacKenzie, Thevenot) should be taken as a point of departure in studies of the culture of classification in the education system in order to address what is at stake

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We live in an age of quantification. In our everyday lives as university professors, parents, and citizens, we encounter statistics at almost every crossroad as, for instance, assessment and productivity scores, grades, and ratings. We argue that knowledge (statistical classifications, norms, ideas, etc.) is embedded in practice as collective/intersubjective action.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call