Abstract
This article considers the debate about quangos, which occurred in Britain during the 1970s. Contributions from academics, politicians and popular commentators are evaluated and contrasted. The study identifies five main concerns about these organisations. They are accused of being wasteful, unaccountable and too numerous. The system of ministerial appointments and the provision of information about quangos are also criticised. The debate is linked to wider political themes such as the role of the state, governmental effectiveness and ministerial power.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
