Abstract


 
 
 Quality of work-life (QWL) is concerned with the welfare and satisfaction of employees on the job as well as off the job. The purpose of this research is to undertake a combination of descriptive study - to ascertain and explain the level of QWL among the employees of the University of The Gambia – and hypothesis testing - to establish the relationship between QWL and demographic factors of the respondents. Summary of the results indicate that interestingly, four aspects of QWL stand in employees’ evaluation as “moderate-to-high” motivators such as relations and co-operations, autonomy of work, and organizational culture and climate. However, to “moderate-to-low” level of motivation with QWL aspects has been reported, such as job satisfaction and job security, training and development, work environment, adequacy of resources, compensation and rewards, and facilities. Moreover, results also indicate that respondents differ significantly in their QWL in terms of designation, education and monthly salary. They however do not differ significantly in their QWL in terms of gender, age and work experience. Our original contribution to research is that we examine an application of QWL in a context (i.e. UTG) that has not existed in extant literature. The result also provides managerial implications that is unique to the case under study, which confirms the multidisciplinary nature of QWL. Thus, although these results slightly vary with few studies, our results confirm findings of several other scholars.
 
 

Highlights

  • The performance and productivity of an organization depend on how effective and efficient it manages its resources (e.g. Kermansaravi, Navidian, Rigi&Yaghoubinia, 2015; Darabi, Mehdizadeh, Arefi&Ghasemi, 2013)

  • Data were analyzed with SPSS 24 and several tests have been conducted ranging from descriptive statistics to determine the overall quality of work-life (QWL), independent T-test to compare the mean differences for some demographic factors and one-way ANOVA for others

  • The descriptive statistics revealed that University of The Gambia (UTG) employees who participated in the research are moderately dissatisfied with their overall QWL on a five-point Likert scale

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The performance and productivity of an organization depend on how effective and efficient it manages its resources (e.g. Kermansaravi, Navidian, Rigi&Yaghoubinia, 2015; Darabi, Mehdizadeh, Arefi&Ghasemi, 2013). Organizational resources vary and workforce or human resources constitute one of the most critical resources. The human resources scholars argue that an empowered and motivated workforce has significant implication on productivity (Monkevicius, 2014; Jebel, 2013). Human resource is an important asset to the organization and when they are dissatisfied, they become the organization’s first enemy (Swamy, Nanjundeswaraswamy and Rashmi, 2015). The noticed that to sustain in the competitive market, organizations must treat the employees as assets, not liabilities through responsible humanized job design process known as quality of work-life (QWL). Philosophically, QWL is a set of principles that recognizes the importance of human resources (i.e. the people) resource in any organization. Can be trusted to make responsible and valuable contributions to Archives of Business Research (ABR)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call