Abstract

BackgroundAndrogen deprivation therapy (ADT) is an effective palliation treatment in men with advanced prostate cancer (PC). However, ADT has well documented side effects that could alter the patient’s health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The current study aims to test whether a genetic stratification could provide better knowledge for optimising ADT options to minimize HRQoL effects.MethodsA cohort of 206 PC survivors (75 treated with and 131 without ADT) was recruited with written consent to collect patient characteristics, clinical data and HRQoL data related to PC management. The primary outcomes were the percentage scores under each HRQoL subscale assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life questionnaires (QLQ-C30 and PR25) and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales developed by the University of Melbourne, Australia. Genotyping of these men was carried out for the aldo-keto reductase family 1, member C3 (AKR1C3) rs12529 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). Analysis of HRQoL scores were carried out against ADT duration and in association with the AKR1C3 rs12529 SNP using the generalised linear model. P-values <0 · 05 were considered significant, and were further tested for restriction with Bonferroni correction.ResultsIncrease in hormone treatment-related effects were recorded with long-term ADT compared to no ADT. The C and G allele frequencies of the AKR1C3rs12529 SNP were 53·4 % and 46·6 % respectively. Hormone treatment-related symptoms showed an increase with ADT when associated with the AKR1C3 rs12529 G allele. Meanwhile, decreasing trends on cancer-specific symptoms and increased sexual interest were recorded with no ADT when associated with the AKR1C3 rs12529 G allele and reverse trends with the C allele. As higher incidence of cancer-specific symptoms relate to cancer retention it is possible that associated with the C allele there could be higher incidence of unresolved cancers under no ADT options.ConclusionsIf these findings can be reproduced in larger homogeneous cohorts, a genetic stratification based on the AKR1C3 rs12529 SNP, can minimize ADT-related HRQoL effects in PC patients. Our data additionally show that with this stratification it could also be possible to identify men needing ADT for better oncological advantage.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12894-016-0164-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is an effective palliation treatment in men with advanced prostate cancer (PC)

  • Karunasinghe et al BMC Urology (2016) 16:48 (Continued from previous page). If these findings can be reproduced in larger homogeneous cohorts, a genetic stratification based on the AKR1C3 rs12529 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), can minimize ADT-related health-related quality of life (HRQoL) effects in PC patients

  • The luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists suppress the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors at the hypothalamus. This subsequently affects the production of luteinizing hormone and follicular stimulating hormone at the pituitary resulting in reduced testicular androgen production for up to 97 % [2]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is an effective palliation treatment in men with advanced prostate cancer (PC). Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is an effective treatment in men with advanced metastatic PC and those with high risk tumors in combination with radiation therapy (RT) [1]. The main types of medical castration methods used in New Zealand are the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists and the anti-androgens (AA). The LHRH agonists suppress the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors at the hypothalamus. This subsequently affects the production of luteinizing hormone and follicular stimulating hormone at the pituitary resulting in reduced testicular androgen production for up to 97 % [2]. Androgen is produced in the prostate by adrenal derived dehydroepiandrosterone [3]. In patients with high tumour burden and with metastatic disease, AA monotherapy does not provide castration as with LHRH agonists [6]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call