Abstract

Biological medicines are considered as a cornerstone in the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). They change the course of the disease and improve the quality of life of patients. To this date there has been no study comparing the quality of life of and cost of RA therapy in Bulgaria. This fact is what provoked our interest toward this research. The aim of this study is to analyse the cost and quality of life of patients with RA threated with biological medicines in Bulgaria. This is an observational, real life study of 124 patients treated with biological medicines during 2012–2016 at the University hospital “St. Ivan Riskli” in Sofia, specialized in rheumatology disease therapy. Patients were recruited after their consecutive transfer from non-biological to biological medicines. The yearly pharmacotherapy cost was calculated with tocilizumab (n = 30), cetrolizmab (n = 16), golimumab (n = 22), etanercept (n = 20), adalimumab (n = 20), rituximab (n = 16). Three measurements of the quality of life (QoL) were performed with EQ5D—at the beginning of the therapy, after 6 months and after 1 year of therapy. Both section of EQ5D were used—VAS and EQ5D questionnaire. Cost—effectiveness was calculated for unit of improvement in EQ5D score for a one year period and decision model was built with TreeAgePro software. The observed cost of therapy varied between 12 thousand Euros for tocilizumab to 6 thousand Euros for rituximab. All biological medicines let to substantial increase in the quality of life of the patients. Patients on tocilizumab increased their QoL from 0.43 to 0.63 after 1 year; on cetrolizumab from 0.32 to 0.56; on golimumab from 0.41 to 0.67; on etanercept from 0.45 to 0.62; on adalimumab from 0.43 to 0.57; on rhituximab from 0.46 to 0.66. The cost-effectiveness estimates of different biological therapies also varied between 66 to 30 thousand Euros for unit of improvement in the EQ5D during one the course of the year. Therapy with biological medicines improves statistically significant the quality of life of patients, measured through VAS and EQ5D scales. Despite the improvement in the quality of life all biological medicines appears not to be note cost-effective due to their high incremental cost-effectiveness ration (ICER). Rituximab's incremental ratio has (ICER) falls closer to the three times gross domestic product per capita threshold and should be considered as preferred alternatives for RA therapy. In general we can conclude that the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with biologicals improves quality of life significantly. Only rituximab was cost-effective.

Highlights

  • Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common, chronic, autoimmune disease with world prevalence of 0.5–1% of the population (Woolf and Pfleger, 2003)

  • Significant quality of life (QoL) increases were observed for both EQ5D scales (Table 1)

  • Similar increases were observed in the combined EQ5D evaluation—from 0.42 to 0.624 points

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common, chronic, autoimmune disease with world prevalence of 0.5–1% of the population (Woolf and Pfleger, 2003). In Romania the prevalence is 0.2% among males and 0.5% among females, in Russia around 0.68% (Orlewska et al, 2011). For Bulgaria in 2008 registered patients with RA numbered 29 711 (0.4%) (Kobelt and Kasteng, 2009). RA affects mortality and quality of life of patients (Blumenauer et al, 2003; Haroon et al, 2007). The average life expectancy is 4 years lower for males with RA and 10 years for females than their respective averages. In patients with severely affected mobility, acute form of RA, visceral manifestation, and concomitant diseases the mortality rate is higher (Kvien, 2004)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call