Abstract

BackgroundAlthough endovascular therapy (EVT) improves clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke, the time of EVT initiation significantly influences clinical outcomes and healthcare costs. This study evaluated the impact of EVT treatment delay on cost-effectiveness in China.MethodsA model combining a short-term decision tree and long-term Markov health state transition matrix was constructed. For each time window of symptom onset to EVT, the probability of receiving EVT or non-EVT treatment was varied, thereby varying clinical outcomes and healthcare costs. Clinical outcomes and cost data were derived from clinical trials and literature. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and incremental net monetary benefits were simulated. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the model. The willingness-to-pay threshold per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) was set to ¥71,000 ($10,281).ResultsEVT performed between 61 and 120 min after the stroke onset was most cost-effective comparing to other time windows to perform EVT among AIS patients in China, with an ICER of ¥16,409/QALY ($2376) for performing EVT at 61–120 min versus the time window of 301–360 min. Each hour delay in EVT resulted in an average loss of 0.45 QALYs and 165.02 healthy days, with an average net monetary loss of ¥15,105 ($2187).ConclusionsEarlier treatment of acute ischemic stroke patients with EVT in China increases lifetime QALYs and the economic value of care without any net increase in lifetime costs. Thus, healthcare policies should aim to improve efficiency of pre-hospital and in-hospital workflow processes to reduce the onset-to-puncture duration in China.

Highlights

  • Endovascular therapy (EVT) improves clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke, the time of endovascular therapy (EVT) initiation significantly influences clinical outcomes and healthcare costs

  • Base case analysis Based on simulated outcomes from the six time windows in our model, EVT performed in the earlier time window was associated with more life-time quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and higher total healthcare costs

  • Based on the increasing order of simulated costs, EVT initiated within 301–360 min was associated an Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) of ¥15,712 in relation to the time window of 361–420 min

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Endovascular therapy (EVT) improves clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke, the time of EVT initiation significantly influences clinical outcomes and healthcare costs. This study evaluated the impact of EVT treatment delay on cost-effectiveness in China. Among all type of strokes including acute ischemic stroke (AIS), Clinical efficacy of EVT in the treatment of AIS has been demonstrated compared to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in improving mortality rates and functional outcomes among patients with AIS, and further influences post-stroke care in the long-term [2,3,4,5,6,7]. According to previous studies the outcomes of EVT are timedependent and decline with increasing delay between stroke onset and initiation of EVT [8]. The treatment guidelines in China recommend EVT in AIS patients within 6 h of symptom onset [1]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call