Quality of life after surgical correction of penile deviation with the Schroeder-Essed plication

Abstract

For the correction of congenital and acquired penile deviations, there are two established operative methods: the Nesbit procedure and the Schroeder-Essed technique. However, which operative method is optimal with respect to the specific underlying pathology, is still controversial. The aim of the study was to evaluate patient satisfaction retrospectively after modified Essed-Schroeder plication using quality of life questionnaires. Between June 1997 and June 2000, 59 patients underwent Essed-Schroeder at our institution for correction of a penile deviation. Mean patient age was 40 years (18 - 71) and mean follow-up 30 months (19 - 36). A standardised questionnaire was sent to all patients. Of these, the questionnaires completed by 50 patients could be assessed as valid. Of these 50 patients, 22 suffered from a congenital penis deviation, 28 from Peyronie's disease. The percentage of patients who were able to perform sexual intercourse pre- and postoperatively was 62 % and 90 %, respectively. The proportion of patients who felt hampered during intercourse was reduced from 68 % to 48 %. Frequency of pain occurring during intercourse was diminished by half. Sixty percent of the patients would choose to have the same operation again, while 22 % were dissatisfied with the results. None of the patients showed complete erectile dysfunction after the operation. Seventy-four percent of the patients observed a decrease in penile length. In patients with Peyronie's disease, the Schroeder-Essed technique with tunica plicature leds to significant improvement in relatively few cases. Alternative methods, such as the Nesbit corporoplasty, appear to be superior in these patients. In cases of congenital penile deviation, however, where the aim is cosmetic correction under maximum protection of erectile function, the Schroeder-Essed tunica plicature has shown good results with regard to penile function and quality of life.