Abstract

Purpose: According to guideline recommendations, chest compressions (CC) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) should be performed at a rate of 100 - 120 per minute, with a CC fraction (CCF) of ≥80%. The aim of this work is to explore whether CC quality differs between advanced life support (ALS) and basic life support (BLS) performed by two rescuers. Method: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed by two ambulance personnel in ten ALS and ten BLS manikin scenarios. Data from these scenarios were then compared with data on ten ALS cases from the clinical setting, all with non-shockable rhythms. Data from the first two 5-minute periods of CC were evaluated from impedance data (LIFEPAK 12 defibrillator monitors) using a modified Laerdal Skillmaster manikin. Quality parameters compared were: number of CC pauses (CCPs), total time of CC (%), number of CC given and CC rate/min. Results: During the first 5 minutes, the BLS manikin scenarios had the highest number of CCPs, 15 (14 - 16), compared with the ALS manikin scenario, 14 (13 - 15), and the clinical ALS cases, 12 (10 - 15). The BLS scenario also had the highest CCFs, 81% (77% - 85%), and number of CC, 450 (435 - 495), compared with the ALS manikin scenario, 75% (64% - 81%) and 400 (365 - 444) respectively, and the clinical ALS cases, 63% (50% - 74%) and 408 (306 - 489). The median rate of CC/min in the BLS scenario was 115 (110 - 120) compared with the ALS manikin scenario, 110 (106 - 115), and the clinical ALS cases, 130 (118 - 146). During the second 5-minute period, the BLS scenario had the highest number of CCPs, 16 (15 - 17), compared with 15 (14 - 16) for the ALS manikin scenario and 11 (11 - 12) for the clinical ALS cases. The CCF in the BLS setting was 79% (75% - 83%), and the number of CC 455 (430 - 480), compared with the ALS manikin scenario, 79% (74% - 84%) and 435 (395 - 480) respectively, and the clinical ALS cases, 71% (57% - 77%) and 388 (321 - 469) respectively. The median CC rate was 118 (113 - 124) for BLS, 111 (105 - 120) for ALS manikins and 123 (103 - 128) CC/min for clinical ALS cases. Conclusion: None of the groups being studied could deliver CC at a rate of 100 - 120 CC/min or a CCF of ≥80% over the whole 10-minute period in any of the resuscitation scenarios analyzed. However, BLS had the best compliance with CC quality recommendations according to the 2010 guidelines.

Highlights

  • Cardio pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is an important factor contributing to survival when treating a cardiac arrest caused by myocardial infarction [1]-[6]

  • The aim of the present study is to explore whether there are quality differences between chest compressions (CC), performed by two ambulance personnel, in two 10 minutes manikin scenarios of advanced life support (ALS), and basic life support (BLS) compared to ALS in the of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) setting [11]

  • The results from this study show that none of the included ambulance personnel in any of the three scenarios explored succeeded in maintaining a CC rate of 100 - 120 and a CC fraction (CCF) of ≥80% over the whole 10-minute period

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cardio pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is an important factor contributing to survival when treating a cardiac arrest caused by myocardial infarction [1]-[6]. Delivery of high-quality chest compressions (CC) is essential in this process and its effects on outcome have been studied in both experimental and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) studies [7]-[10]. The American Heart Association (AHA) 2010 resuscitation guidelines [11] focused on high-quality CC and emphasized that rescuers should perform CC at an adequate rate (100 - 120 CC/min), adequate depth (5 - 6 cm), and with a minimum of interruptions, while avoiding leaning and hyperventilation. In July 2013, the AHA published a consensus statement that, besides previously described parameters, emphasized that CC fraction (CCF; % of time) should be at least 80% [12]. Chest compression fraction is the proportion of time that CC is performed during a cardiac arrest

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call