Quality of care in family planning in Latin America.

Abstract

The majority of family planning programs in Latin America have been implemented in response to the region's population growth and aimed mainly at obtaining quantitative results, leaving quality, from the user's point of view, in second place. Recent decades have witnessed an increasing concern for quality of care in family planning because most researchers and service providers began to realize that when contraceptive methods are delivered without maintaining high quality levels, continuation rates are usually low and the image of methods and services is impaired. This paper reviews the level of quality of services in family planning in Latin America following Judith Bruce's framework and proposes, some activities that may improve it. The analysis found severe deficiencies in almost all the elements mentioned by Bruce, mainly in choice, technical competence, and mechanisms for improving continuity. The authors propose that to improve quality, services should (a) generate top management commitment to quality, (b) stay close to the client/user, (c) improve work conditions of providers/health workers, (d) measure quality, and (e) reward quality. The authors' conclusions are that (a) better quality services lead to better program results, (b) high quality is cost-effective, (c) managerial commitment is critical to improvement of quality, and (d) quality of care is not a luxury; it is necessary and possible in all settings.