QUALITY OF ARCHITECUTRE AND PUBLIC SPACES AS A RESULT OF COUNTRY’S PUBLIC PROCUREMENT CULTURE

Maciej Wojciech Kowalczyk

doi:10.15503/jecs20192.103.108

Abstract

Thesis. The quality of emerging public spaces and buildings is related to the public procurement culture of a given country. One can not count on achieving high quality public space, architecture without a democratic debate on the subject. The space, which is decided only by a small group of technocrats, the project, which is subject to only the price criterion, results in accidental solutions. Methods. The article shows the basic methods provided for by law to select public projects. Indicates the advantages and disadvantages of individual processes. It analyzes examples of appreciated realizations that arose as a result of architectural competitions. Results. Tools provided in the public procurement law, such as social debate in the form of architectural competitions build a better quality of the created space. The existence of such a link is proven by the awards granted to spaces completed under such processes. Conclusions. Projects created using these tools account for less than 1% of all public procurement in Poland. One should strive for a change that would promote these processes, especially outside large cities, thus increasing the quality of spaces created from public money.

Highlights

Tools provided in the public procurement law, such as social debate in the form of architectural competitions build a better quality of the created space
Analyzing the above examples of three prizes awarded to completed objects and public spaces, it should be stated that the vast majority of objects that have been awarded are objects selected through the architectural design contest
The above analysis of the examples shows that the vast majority of objects and public spaces selected through the competition are later appreciated

Summary

Introduction

Tools provided in the public procurement law, such as social debate in the form of architectural competitions build a better quality of the created space. It can be concluded that in a country where the broadly understood competition procedure is promoted, a better new design space is created than in a country where the project is selected through a tender procedure mainly based on the price of the design service. In order to better understand the topic, it is necessary to deÀne the main differences between the tender and the competition as well as the practice of their application in the framework of providing architectural and urban design services.

Results

Conclusion