Quality not quantity: Key success factors from the first decade of safety reports from the Research on Adverse Drug Events and Reports project (RADAR)

Abstract

6559 Background: RADAR is the only independent academic pharmacovigilance organization funded exclusively by peer-reviewed grants. We describe the role of high quality case reports in the detection of drug safety signals. Methods: RADAR has identified 11 cancer-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Initial reports for small numbers of cases were obtained from our own institution, NU, (4 ADRs) or from referral centers (7 ADRs). Clinicians at these centers voluntarily provided brief case reports to RADAR, who submitted detailed case reports to the FDA/manufacturer. Clinicians were promised that patient/provider data would be kept confidential and that these data would be submitted as peer-reviewed manuscripts. Results: See Table. Conclusions: RADAR was successful at signal generation and amplification because it focused on quality, not quantity of case reports. Pharmacovigilance efforts that allow clinicians to complete brief forms, maintain confidentiality of patient and provider, and result in submission of collaborative manuscripts may improve early detection of drug safety signals initiatives in oncology. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.