Abstract

This paper explores a new framework for calculating hybrid system metrics using software quality metrics aspect-oriented and object-oriented programming. Software metrics for qualitative and quantitative measurement is a mix of static and dynamic software metrics. It is noticed from the literature survey that to date, most of the architecture considered only the evaluation focused on static metrics for aspect-oriented applications. In our work, we mainly discussed the collection of static parameters , long with AspectJ-specific dynamic software metrics.The structure may provide a new direction for research while predicting software attributes because earlier dynamic metrics were ignored when evaluating quality attributes such as maintainability, reliability, and understandability of Asepect Oriented software. Dynamic metrics based on the fundamentals of software engineering are equally crucial for software analysis as are static metrics. A similar concept is borrowed with the introduction of dynamic software metrics to implement aspect-riented software development.Currently, we only propose a structure and model using static and dynamic parameters to test the aspect-oriented method, but we still need to validate the proposed approach.

Highlights

  • Aspect-oriented programming (AOP) may be a fairly new method that has been argued for enabling higher modularization of crosscutting concerns [1] and hastening the event process

  • This paper presents the results of preliminary empirical evaluation of the software quality AOP metrics on software AO/OO hybrid software quality

  • Question 1: How does AOP make the modularity of a program an object? Question 2: Which impact does AOP have on the scale of a system? Goal 2:The AOP metrics impact on AO/OO software quality ? Question 1: can the proposing quality metrics derived from ISO/9126 software will promising new era of measuring hybrid application software

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Aspect-oriented programming (AOP) may be a fairly new method that has been argued for enabling higher modularization of crosscutting concerns [1] and hastening the event process. With three open AO/OO projects, using a script to extract AOP and the Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) metric approach and reflect on new proposal quality framework. The paper includes a comparison of the developed systems AOP and OOP,Chidamber and Kemerer (hereafter CK)[2], Distance from the most sequence metric proposed by Chidamber and Kemerer Martin[3], out-of-code standard metric (defined as acceptance variety Tests passed)[4,5,6], and productivity metrics for programmers. CK Technology metrics[2] adapted to new aspect-oriented properties [7][8][9][10]. Even scarcer is anecdotal Evidence of the effect of aspect-oriented programming on software format quality, or development efficiency metrics.

RELATED WORK
Measurements
GTalkWAP
AspectJ HotDraw
AOP metrics extraction
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call