Abstract
In a prospective observational study, the implementation of complete mesocolic excision (CME) from 1978 through to 2014 was examined in light of process and outcome quality during ongoing developments in treatment for colon carcinoma. Data from 2019 patients with stage I–III colon carcinoma were analysed by comparing five time periods – 1978–1984 (pre-CME), 1985–1994 (CME development), 1995–2002 (CME implementation), 2003–2009 (CME) and 2010–2014 (CME) – with a special focus on indicators of process and outcome quality. Over the 37-year period, the patients became older, and right-sided carcinoma was more common and more likely to present at stage I, which is associated with a favourable prognosis. Fewer patients had regional lymph node metastases. The proportion of patients with histology-negative lymph nodes (pN0) with at least 12 examined regional lymph nodes increased significantly, to 100%, as did the curative (R0) resection rate, and the application of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon carcinoma increased to 79%. The 5-year rate of locoregional recurrence decreased significantly, from 6.7% to 2.1% ( p =0.008). The cancer-related 5-year survival rate increased significantly, from 78.9% to 90.6% ( p <0.001). In multivariate analysis, the date of treatment in the series chronology was found to be an independent prognostic factor for locoregional recurrence ( p =0.018) and cancer-related survival ( p =0.001). In summary, the quality indicators of process and outcome quality improved with CME. Adjuvant chemotherapy at stage III and multidisciplinary approaches in patients with metachronous distant metastases also improved outcomes. Strict quality management is mandatory to accompany changes in treatment.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.