Abstract
PurposeThis paper aims to evaluate the quality control systems for constructions in seven countries in Europe with the purpose to trace innovative approaches and best practices that can serve as examples for other countries.Design/methodology/approachThe paper is based on a series of research projects carried out over a number of years. The research results were updated in 2016 with a desktop research project in seven European countries. The results from this latest project form the heart of this paper. The information is organised into tables that describe and analyse the main features of the quality control systems of the countries (e.g. scope, focus and main characteristics of the procedures and quality demands on building professionals).FindingsSeveral similar trends can be recognised in the quality control systems of the various European Union (EU) countries. Quality control is getting more and more privatised and the control framework is setting checks and balances throughout the construction process. Other findings are that scope and focus of the statutory control is unbalanced. Within the control processes emphasis is put on the safety aspects of complex constructions. Far fewer demands are made on the quality of the builders. Re-orientation of the building regulatory framework seems to be needed.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper only focusses on European countries where private quality control is established and on selected topics. The findings are based on desktop research and not on the practical experiences of the stakeholders involved in the countries studied.Practical implicationsThe paper draws some important recommendations for policymakers in the building regulatory field. It suggests both an enhancement of the effectiveness of the quality control procedure as well as the commitment of builders to comply with the regulations.Social implicationsThe quality of constructions is essential for the wellbeing and safety of its users, its occupants or its visitors. This applies to the whole range of quality aspects: structural- and fire safety, health, sustainability and usability aspects. The analyses and recommendations of this paper aim to contribute to an improvement of the overall construction quality.Originality/valueThe paper makes an original contribution to the (limited) literature that is available in this field. The results can be used to situate the quality control systems of each member state within the EU, to assess the main trends, and it can be used as a guide to develop strategic choices on possible improvements in each country.
Highlights
Starting point of this paper is recent building regulatory developments in The Netherlands
Some technical requirements have been withdrawn from the regulations, and the number of constructions that are exempt from quality control has been enlarged substantially (Meijer and Visscher, 1998, 2006, 2016; Costa Branco et al, 2011)
The paper is based on a series of research projects on building regulatory systems carried out by the authors from the mid-90s on
Summary
Starting point of this paper is recent building regulatory developments in The Netherlands. 3. Scope of quality control procedures The general rule in all countries is that all constructions have to meet the requirements set in the building regulations. Scope of quality control procedures The general rule in all countries is that all constructions have to meet the requirements set in the building regulations These requirements demand for a range of issues (from fire safety to sustainability) and building components (e.g. stairs, windows and ceiling height) a minimum quality level. The few legal obligations that are in place in the countries focus on structural and fire safety regulations This especially applies to the quality control of complex constructions (Meijer and Visscher, 2016). A distinction is made between demands on private quality controllers (paragraph 6.1) and demands on builders and installers (paragraph 6.2)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Law in the Built Environment
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
