Abstract
Using a scientific measurement without an estimate of its error is like lending money to a stranger. Given the explosion in nucleic acid and protein sequence and structural data, what risks are the scientific and medical communities running in using these databases. Is there an 'ombudsman' who speaks for the users of the data? CODATA, the Committee on Data for Science and Technology of the International Council of Scientific Unions was established to improve the quality, reliability, processing, management, and accessibility of data for science and technology. The CODATA Task Group on Biological Macromolecules has surveyed quality control procedures of archival databanks in molecular biology. Our role is 'to advise, to be consulted, and to warn.' This report describes the kinds and extents of errors that may appear in nucleic acid and protein databases, and presents an agenda for future work to improve the quality of these databases. The results of the survey appear on the webhttp://www.codata.org/codata/tgreports/ tg_reps.html.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
