Abstract

The role of education’s quality in determining international students’ choice of study destination was discussed by several studies. However, it only seems to have gained a huge prominence recently by constituting a theme in the quality management field involving empirical studies. In spite of such prominence the theme does not seems to provide sufficient empirical evidence forging a nexus between quality assurance practices, training needs and international student’s mobility. This research work therefore attempts to fill this gap by examining how the search for quality education and training needs satisfaction play role in international student’s mobility. Six dimensions of quality assurance in education were identified through extensive literature reviewed, three dimensions of training needs were equally revealed by the literature. Nine hypotheses were thus developed using these dimensions with the view to explain the relationship among the variables involved. The primary data for this study was obtained through a cross-sectional survey of International students in University Utara Malaysia with the aid of questionnaires, where a total of 150 respondents were selected randomly. Partial Least Squares (PLS) method was adopted in analysing the collected data with smartPLS 2.0 to determine the relationship involved. The result supported the relationship between organizational needs, Tangibility of facilities, Nature of service delivery and international student’s mobility, while the other six relationships were not supported.

Highlights

  • Quality assurance frameworks are gradually becoming very vital to the growth and survival of higher educational institutions which primarily serve as a mechanism for the enhancement of competitiveness and organizational viability (Strong & Taylor, 2011)

  • Educational institutions are looking to revamp their level of effectiveness in both capacity and functions, in which quality assurance frameworks are considered the proper mechanisms for the achievement of these goals (Ganguli & Roy, 2011; Usman, Romle & Qader, 2015)

  • Quality assurance frameworks in higher education recently keep becoming prominent in the European and American societies (Usman, Romle and Qader, 2015). This development could be ascribed to the way in which greater emphasis is placed on skill and expertise as crucial components for higher productivity in which the most critical factor in deciding the rate of development of a given society is hinged on the proportion of its manpower that have access to quality education (Okebukola, 2012)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Quality assurance frameworks are gradually becoming very vital to the growth and survival of higher educational institutions which primarily serve as a mechanism for the enhancement of competitiveness and organizational viability (Strong & Taylor, 2011). This development could be ascribed to the way in which greater emphasis is placed on skill and expertise as crucial components for higher productivity in which the most critical factor in deciding the rate of development of a given society is hinged on the proportion of its manpower that have access to quality education (Okebukola, 2012) This development has invariably created an increasing demand for quality education globally, where both public and private organizations appear to be very meticulous and quality conscious in their recruitment and training programs (Guerry & De Feyter, 2012). This compels some organizations and individuals to start searching for quality education across their national boundaries (Usman, Romle & Qader, 2015)

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call