Abstract
ABSTRACT Friction rock stabilizers (FRS) are routinely used to provide rock reinforcement to excavations in hard rock. Since the expiration of the original patent taken out in 1977, FRS are now available from multiple suppliers. The expectation that all FRS are equivalent, however, is not necessarily accurate. There are inherent variations in the design configuration, material chemistry/properties, and consequently in performance. In this context, a full traceability from steel grade and heat treatment to final product is critical. This paper reports the results of a QA/QC investigation aiming to identify the material properties for three equivalent FRS from the same supplier. A series of mechanical and accelerated corrosion tests highlighted the differences in these rockbolts. This work provides a template for a more comprehensive quality assurance programme to ensure compliance of FRS. This is critical when rockbolts, due to global supply chain constraints, are outsourced from multiple sources worldwide.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
